Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3216954
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:21:18+00:00 2026-05-17T15:21:18+00:00

I’ve got a memory leak in Upstart init process (pid 1), what options I

  • 0

I’ve got a memory leak in Upstart init process (pid 1), what options I have on debugging it?

EDIT: Suggest me some real tools for this, manually putting printfs or calculating memory allocations by hand isn’t gonna cut it. Also dumping init core and poking around that is not really an option.

UPD1: valgrind doesn’t work. Replacing /sbin/init on kernel command line with proper valgrind + init magic doesn’t seem to be an option as it tries to access /proc for self for smaps, but those isn’t available before init is ran.

UPD2: dmalloc doesn’t work either (doesn’t compile on ARM).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:21:18+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:21 pm

    A poor man’s solution would be to just log every call malloc and free, then comb through the logs and look for pattern.

    ld provides an amazing feature that could help here.

    --wrap=symbol

    Use a wrapper function for symbol. Any undefined reference to symbol
    will be resolved to “__wrap_symbol”. Any undefined reference
    to “__real_symbol” will be resolved to symbol.

    This can be used to provide a wrapper for a system function. The
    wrapper function should be called “__wrap_symbol”. If it wishes to
    call the system function, it should call “__real_symbol”.

    Here is a trivial example:

    void *
    __wrap_malloc (size_t c)
    {
       printf ("malloc called with %zu\n", c);
       return __real_malloc (c);
    }
    

    If you link other code with this file using –wrap malloc, then all
    calls to “malloc” will call the function “__wrap_malloc” instead.
    The call to “__real_malloc” in “__wrap_malloc” will call the real
    “malloc” function.

    You may wish to provide a “__real_malloc” function as well, so that
    links without the –wrap option will succeed. If you do this, you
    should not put the definition of “__real_malloc” in the same file
    as “__wrap_malloc”; if you do, the assembler may resolve the call
    before the linker has a chance to wrap it to “malloc”.


    Update

    Just to be clear on how this is useful.

    • Add a custom file to Upstart’s build.

    Like this:

    void*__wrap_malloc( size_t c )
    {
       void *malloced = __real_malloc(c);
       /* log malloced with its associated backtrace*/
       /* something like: <malloced>: <bt-symbol-1>, <bt-symbol-2>, .. */
       return malloced
    }
    
    void __wrap_free( void* addr )
    {
       /* log addr with its associated backtrace*/
       /* something like: <addr>: <bt-symbol-1>, <bt-symbol-2>, .. */
       __real_free(addr);
    }
    
    • Recompile upstart with debug symbols (-g) so you can get some nice backtraces. You can still optimize (-O2/-O3) the code if you wish.

    • Link Upstart with the extra LD_FLAGS --wrap=malloc, --wrap=free.
      Now anywhere Upstart calls malloc the symbol will be magically resolved to your new symbol __wrap_malloc. Beautifully this is all transparent to the compiled code as it happens at link time.
      It’s like shimming or instrumenting with out any of the mess.

    • Run the recompiled Upstart as usual until you’re sure the leak has occured.

    • Look through the logs for mismatch malloceds and addrs.

    A couple of notes:

    • The --wrap=symbol feature does not work with function names that are actually macros. So watch out for #define malloc nih_malloc. The this is what libnih does you’d need to use --wrap=nih_malloc and __wrap_nih_malloc instead.
    • Use gcc’s builtin backtracing features.
    • All of these changes only affect the recompiled Upstart executable.
    • You could dump the logs to an sqlite DB instead with may make it easier to find mismatch mallocs and frees.
    • you can make you log format an SQL insert statement then just insert them into a database post-mortem for further analysis.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.