Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9071405
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T17:54:10+00:00 2026-06-16T17:54:10+00:00

I’ve got a personal project, which I doubt would exceed 20 pairs of header/cpp

  • 0

I’ve got a personal project, which I doubt would exceed 20 pairs of header/cpp files. I was wondering whether it would be better to have each header and cpp file include the other files that it needs (or use forward declarations), or have every file include “Includes.hpp” which in turn includes all of the standard libraries, gives a forward declaration for each class, then includes all of my other headers.

As I can see, using one big header file:

  • Cleans everything up
  • Makes it easier to include these files from other directories (as you only need to navigate to use one file, which then links all of the others)
  • Will include all files for every compilation, which considering this is a small project, isn’t a disadvantage, as I’ll be using all of the files

Is this a good idea?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T17:54:12+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 5:54 pm

    I would say that in general this is a bad idea for several reasons:

    • It gives you poor encapsulation: clients should just pull in the headers they need. With this approach the inclusion will pull in everything, which as Alok mentions will increase build time and sensitivity to rebuilds
    • There’s no distinction between interface classes and implementation classes, ie those that clients of your library use and ones that are used internally by this library that clients don’t need to (and perhaps shouldn’t) see
    • If any of your headers define macros then these may now ‘leak’ into any other code that includes the header, which may be undesirable. Anyone who’s ever had to type #undef MIN will know this pain.
    • There’s a possibility of recursive inclusion if you have several classes that need to be aware of each other, so it may be sensitive to the order of inclusion or you’ll get include cycles

    I think though there is one instance where it may be acceptable, which is if your library only provides a few classes/functions that are intended to be called by clients, and all the rest are just internal classes used by the implementation. So clients can just include mylib.h and that’s all they need to worry about. This also makes it easier if you want to compile your library as a static library as you can just distribute the library and one header.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have an autohotkey script which looks up a word in a bilingual dictionary
I have an array which has BIG numbers and small numbers in it. I
I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from
I'm trying to select an H1 element which is the second-child in its group

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.