Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 558081
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:05:40+00:00 2026-05-13T12:05:40+00:00

I’ve got a problem where I have to read from a named pipe. I

  • 0

I’ve got a problem where I have to read from a named pipe. I have to handle the situation where writers to the named pipe come and go but I need to keep the same pipe open throughout my applications.

I have summarised this in the following code.

int main( int c, char *v[] )
{
    int rfd;
    if ( (rfd = open( PIPENAME, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK )) < 0 )
    {
        perror( "open" );
        return 1;
    }

    char buffer[ 1024000 ];

    // used to give select an upper bound on number of fds
    int nfd = rfd + 1;

    fd_set rfds;
    FD_ZERO( &rfds );
    FD_SET( rfd, &rfds );

    while( true )
    {
        int nr = select( nfd, &rfds, NULL, NULL, NULL );

        if ( nr < 0 )
        {
            perror( "select" );
            break;
        }

        if ( FD_ISSET( rfd, &rfds ) )
        {
            //std::cout << "RFD SET" << std::endl;
            // Ok, we have data we can read
            int nread = read( rfd, buffer, sizeof( buffer ) );
            if ( nread < 0 )
            {
                perror( "read" );
                break;
            }
            else if ( nread == 0 )
            {
                std::cout << "read 0" << std::endl;
            }
            else
            {
                std::cout << "read " << nread << " bytes" << std::endl;

            }

        }
    }

    close( rfd );

    return 0;
}

The problem I have is that after the first process writes to the named pipe and the disconnects (closes) it’s end, my program doesn’t block on the select. It effectively has the rfd set and the read returns zero bytes read in a tight loop.

I need the rfd to be in NON_BLOCKING mode or the open will block until a writer appears.

I’ve tried using fcntl to set to BLOCKING mode but that doesn’t work either.

My limited understanding of the semantics of the pipe makes me think that I need to clear the EOF state on the pipe such that select will now block. However, I’ve no idea how to do this.

I throw myself on your collective wisdom 🙂
Mark.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:05:40+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:05 pm

    OK, I’ve come up with one solution but I’m not really happy with it. It’s a bit of a “hammer to crack a nut” if you ask me.

    .....
    else if ( nread == 0 )   
    {   
        std::cout << "read 0" << std::endl;   
    
        FD_ZERO( &rfds );
        close( rfd );
        if ( (rfd = open( PIPENAME, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK )) < 0 )
        {
            perror( "re-open" );
            break;
        }
        FD_SET( rfd, &rfds );
        nfd = std::max( wfd, rfd ) + 1;
    }   
    else
    .....
    

    Basically, I close and re-open the pipe.

    I’d still welcome a better solution.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.