Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 488919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T01:45:22+00:00 2026-05-13T01:45:22+00:00

I’ve got a simple select query which executes in under 1 second normally, but

  • 0

I’ve got a simple select query which executes in under 1 second normally, but when I add in a contains(column, ‘text’) into the where clause, suddenly it’s running for 20 seconds up to a minute. The table it’s selecting from has around 208k rows.

Any ideas what would cause this query to run so slow with just the addition of the contains clause?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T01:45:23+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:45 am

    Depending on the search keyword and the median length of characters in the column it is logical that it would take a long time.

    Consider searching for ‘cookie’ in a column with median length 100 characters in a dataset of 200k rows.

    Best case scenario with early outs, you would do 100 * 200k = 20m comparisons
    Worst case scenario near missing on every compare, you would do (5 * 100) * 200k = 100m comparisons

    Generally I would:

    • reorder your query to filter out as much as possible in advance prior to string matching
    • limit number of the results if you don’t need all of them at once (TOP x)
    • reduce the number characters in your search term
    • reduce the number of search terms by filtering out terms that are likely to match a lot, or not at all (if applicable)
    • cache query results if possible (however cache invalidation can get pretty tricky if you want to do it right)
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 231k
  • Answers 231k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use the following function like this: Image('/path/to/original.image', '1/1', '150*', './thumb.jpg');… May 13, 2026 at 2:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Check you database schema to see if the field (referenced… May 13, 2026 at 2:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I figured out the problem - there was a session… May 13, 2026 at 2:13 am

Related Questions

I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I have text I am displaying in SIlverlight that is coming from a CMS
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.