Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 967939
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:23:58+00:00 2026-05-16T02:23:58+00:00

I’ve got a sub-select in a query that looks something like this: left outer

  • 0

I’ve got a sub-select in a query that looks something like this:

left outer join
  (select distinct ID from OTHER_TABLE) as MYJOIN
on BASE_OBJECT.ID = MYJOIN.ID

It’s pretty straightforward. Checks to see if a certain relation exists between the main object being queried for and the object represented by OTHER_TABLE by whether or not MYJOIN.ID is null on the row in question.

But now the requirements have changed a little. There’s another row in OTHER_TABLE that can have a value of 1 or 0, and the query needs to know whether a relation exists between the primary for a 1-value, and also if it exists for a 0 value. The obvious solutions is to put:

left outer join
  (select distinct ID, TYPE_VALUE from OTHER_TABLE) as MYJOIN
on BASE_OBJECT.ID = MYJOIN.ID

But that would be wrong because if 0-type and 1-type objects both exist for the same ID, it will increase the number of rows returned by the query, which isn’t acceptable. So what I need is some sort of subselect that will return 1 row for each distinct ID, with a “1-type exists” column and a “0-type exists” column. And I have no idea how to code that in SQL.

For example, for the following table,

ID   | TYPE_VALUE
_________________
1    | 1
3    | 0
3    | 1
4    | 0

I’d like to see a result set like this:

ID   | HAS_TYPE_0 | HAS_TYPE_1
______________________________
1    | 0          | 1
3    | 1          | 1
4    | 1          | 0

Anyone know how I could set up a query to do this? Hopefully with a minimum of ugly hacks?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:23:58+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:23 am

    In the general case, you would use EXISTS:

    SELECT DISTINCT ID,
        CASE WHEN EXISTS (
                SELECT * FROM Table1 y 
                WHERE y.TYPE_VALUE = 0 AND ID = x.ID) 
            THEN 1 
            ELSE 0 END AS HAS_TYPE_0,
        CASE WHEN EXISTS (
                SELECT * FROM Table1 y
                WHERE y.TYPE_VALUE = 1 AND ID = x.ID) 
            THEN 1 
            ELSE 0 END AS HAS_TYPE_1
    FROM Table1 x;
    

    If you have a very large number of elements in the table, this won’t perform so great – those nested subselects are often a kiss of death when it comes to performance.

    For your specific case, you could also use GROUP BY and MAX() and MIN() to speed things up:

    SELECT 
         ID,
         CASE WHEN MIN(TYPE_VALUE) = 0 THEN '1' ELSE 0 END AS HAS_TYPE_0,
         CASE WHEN MAX(TYPE_VALUE) = 1 THEN '1' ELSE 0 END AS HAS_TYPE_1
    FROM Table1
    GROUP BY ID;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.