Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3318776
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:44:47+00:00 2026-05-17T22:44:47+00:00

I’ve got an asp.net application, it’s running on DotNetNuke, under load we get the

  • 0

I’ve got an asp.net application, it’s running on DotNetNuke, under load we get the occasional out of memory exception.

I’ve got a dump loaded it into windbg.

the end of !dumpheap -stat is

1192a588    88684      2128416 AutoMapper.MappingEngine
79333594     9482      2266348 System.Byte[]
134b0034    88695      2838240 System.EventHandler`1[[AutoMapper.TypeMapCreatedEventArgs, AutoMapper]]
13d8703c    88684      4611568 System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[[Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.CacheKey, AutoMapper],[System.Type, mscorlib]]
13d86dc8    88684      4611568 Castle.DynamicProxy.ModuleScope
13d865bc    88684      4611568 System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[[AutoMapper.Internal.TypePair, AutoMapper],[AutoMapper.IObjectMapper, AutoMapper]]
79327434    88703      4612556 System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[[System.String, mscorlib],[System.Int32, mscorlib]]
6c38e4e4    88684      5675776 System.Threading.ReaderWriterLockSlim
79330b24    87736      6458012 System.String
000d9c88      129     24186884      Free
793042f4   221202    101117016 System.Object[]
6c38e4a0 22703104    544874496 System.Threading.ReaderWriterCount

I can’t find much information on the System.Threading.ReaderWriterCount, as it seems to be the problem.

What is the likely cause? Or failing that what’s the best next step to work that out?

Based on the pointer from the given answer I had a look at ReaderWriterLockSlim. I wasn’t using it directly, but I saw that it had 88684 instances, digging deeper I saw quite a few classes with that number of instances, pointing to AutoMapper.MappingEngine. This should be a singleton, so I’ve had a look at where it’s being created. I suspect that it’s the DI container and have made some changes around that to see if it helps

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:44:47+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:44 pm

    ReaderWriterLockSlim is not a cheap class in memory footprint – that could be why your ReaderWriterCount instances are proliferating. See here for detailed info from Reflector.

    Can you reduce usage of this class? Maybe not all of them need to be Read/Write Locks, simple Mutex/lock() might work?

    Note also that this class is IDisposable – perhaps you are not Dispose()-ing of them after you are through with them?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.