Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8922577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T06:52:23+00:00 2026-06-15T06:52:23+00:00

I’ve got some old code where I stored lists of functions in Python as

  • 0

I’ve got some old code where I stored lists of functions in Python as class attributes. These lists are used as a sort of event hook.

To call each function in the list with appropriate arguments, I’ve used one-liners, mixing map with lambda expressions. I’m now concerned that there is unnecessary overhead in using lambda expressions like this.. I guess the recommended way would be to drop both map and lambda and just use a standard for loop, for readability.

Is there a better (read faster) one-liner to do this, though?

For example:

class Foo:
    """Dummy class demonstrating event hook usage."""
    pre  = [] # list of functions to call before entering loop.
    mid  = [] # list of functions to call inside loop, with value
    post = [] # list of functions to call after loop.
    def __init__(self, verbose=False, send=True):
        """Attach functions when initialising class."""
        self._results = []
        if verbose:
            self.mid.append( self._print )
        self.mid.append( self._store )
        if send:
            self.post.append( self._send )

    def __call__(self, values):

        # call each function in self.pre (no functions there)
        map( lambda fn: fn(), self.pre )

        for val in values:
            # call each function in self.mid, with one passed argument
            map( lambda fn: fn(val), self.mid )

        # call each fn in self.post, with no arguments
        map( lambda fn: fn(), self.post )

    def _print(self, value):
        """Print argument, when verbose=True."""
        print value

    def _store(self, value):
        """Store results"""
        self._results.append(value)

    def _send(self):
        """Send results somewhere"""

# create instance of Foo
foo = Foo(verbose=True)

# equivalent to: foo.__call__( ... )
foo( [1, 2, 3, 4] )

Is there a better way to write those one-liner map calls?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T06:52:24+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 6:52 am

    The recommended way is definitely to use for loops, however, if you insist on using map, then operator.methodcaller might be just what you need:

    >>> def foo(*args):
    ...    print 'foo',args
    ... 
    >>> def bar(*args):
    ...    print 'bar',args
    ... 
    >>> from operator import methodcaller
    >>> 
    >>> map(methodcaller('__call__',1,2,3),[foo,bar])
    foo (1, 2, 3)
    bar (1, 2, 3)
    [None, None]
    

    A word of caution about using map for this — It won’t work if you port your code to python 3 since map became lazy.

    You could also use list comprehensions pretty trivially (and that works on python3 also):

    [fn() for fn in self.pre]
    [fn(val) for fn in self.mid]
    

    etc.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.