Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7801671
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T01:01:07+00:00 2026-06-02T01:01:07+00:00

I’ve got this queue class, actually, several that suffer from the same issue –

  • 0

I’ve got this queue class, actually, several that suffer from the same issue – performance will be poor if compiled with a type that has a lengthy copy ctor – the queue is locked during push/pop and the longer it is locked, the greater the chance of contention. It would be useful if the class would not compile if some developer tried to compile it with a 10MB buffer class, (instead of a pointer to it).

It seems that there is no easy way to restrict template parameters to base classes or any other type.

Is there some bodge I can use so that my class will not compile if the parameter is not a pointer to a class instance?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T01:01:08+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 1:01 am

    You can do this in several ways. As another answer points out you can do it with a static_assert (preferably from C++11/Boost although you can roll your own), although I’d recommend checking if it is actually a pointer and not just relying on the size. You can either roll your own or use an existing trait (available in C++11 too) depending on what system you’re using:

    template <typename T>
    struct is_pointer {
      enum { value = 0 };
    };
    
    template <typename T>
    struct is_pointer<T*> {
      enum { value = 1 };
    };
    
    template <typename T>
    struct container {
      static_assert(is_pointer<T>::value, "T must be a pointer");
      void push(const T&);
      T pop();
    };
    
    struct foo {};
    
    int main() {
      container<foo*> good;
      container<foo> fail;
    }
    

    But that raises a bigger point. If your requirement is that you only ever point to things, why not interpret the template parameter like that to begin with? E.g. make your container:

    template <typename T>
    struct container {
      void push(const T*);
      T *pop();
    };
    

    instead of allowing people to specify non-pointer types in the first place?

    Finally if you don’t want to go down the static_assert road you can just specialise the container for pointer types only and not implement it for non-pointers, e.g.:

    template <typename T>
    struct container;
    
    template <typename T>
    struct container<T*> {
      void push(const T*);
      T *pop();
    };
    
    struct foo {};
    
    int main() {
      container<foo*> good;
      container<foo> fail;
    }
    

    This still requires explicitly making the type a pointer, still causes compile time failure for non-pointer types, but doesn’t need a static_assert or way of determining if a type is a pointer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.