Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9245071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T09:11:00+00:00 2026-06-18T09:11:00+00:00

I’ve got two validation functions for my usermodel User.schema.path(’email’).validate(function(value, respond) { User.findOne({email: value}, function(err,

  • 0

I’ve got two validation functions for my usermodel

User.schema.path('email').validate(function(value, respond) {
  User.findOne({email: value}, function(err, user) {
    if(err) throw err;
    if(user) return respond(false);
    respond(true);
  });
}, 'EMAIL_EXISTS');

and the same for username

User.schema.path('username').validate(function(value, respond) {
  User.findOne({username: value}, function(err, user) {
    if(err) throw err;
    if(user) return respond(false);
    respond(true);
  });
}, 'USERNAME_TAKEN');

They return errors in the following format

{ message: 'Validation failed',
  name: 'ValidationError',
  errors: 
    { username: 
      { message: 'Validator "USERNAME_TAKEN" failed for path username',
        name: 'ValidatorError',
        path: 'username',
        type: 'USERNAME_TAKEN' } } }

The error for the email path is similar. Is there a smarter way to check for those errors than the following?

if (err && err.errors && err.errors.username) { ... }

This is kind of ugly.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T09:11:01+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 9:11 am

    Technically you must check first the error name because not all errors are handled the same way. Then, based on the error name you must check for particular properties, as the errors property that comes with a ValidationError.

    Also you put the field name in the error type and this is redundant, it’s better to use the same error type because in the error checking procedure you will get the field name also.

    So your code can be something like:

    User.schema.path('email').validate(function(value, respond) {
      User.findOne({email: value}, function(err, user) {
        if(err) throw err;
        if(user) return respond(false);
        respond(true);
      });
    }, 'exists');
    
    User.schema.path('username').validate(function(value, respond) {
      User.findOne({username: value}, function(err, user) {
        if(err) throw err;
        if(user) return respond(false);
        respond(true);
      });
    }, 'exists');
    

    And then, the error checking procedure:

    if (err) {
      switch (err) {
        case err instanceof mongoose.Error.ValidationError:
          for (field in err.errors) {
            switch (err.errors[field].type) {
              case 'exists':
                ...
                break;
              case 'invalid':
                ...
                break;
              ...
            }
          }
          break;
        default:
          ...
      }
    }
    

    If you want to shorten this, you have various options. If you only have one type of validation you can do it like this:

    if (err) {
      if (err instanceof mongoose.Error.ValidationError) {
        for (field in err.errors) {
          ...
        }
      } else {
        // A general error (db, crypto, etc…)
        ...
      }
    }
    

    The minimal expression of the error check procedure would be similar to what you’ve wrote in your post:

    if (err) {
      for (field in err.errors) {
        ...
      }
    }
    

    This will work because if errors is not defined it will just ignore the for. But you’re ignoring all other error types here.

    I also think that these error layouts are a bit messing, but don’t expect for this to change in a near future.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I've tracked down a weird MySQL problem to the two different ways I was
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string
I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.