Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3428400
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T06:57:16+00:00 2026-05-18T06:57:16+00:00

I’ve just come across a strange behaviour in Oracle where I would expect ORA-00918

  • 0

I’ve just come across a strange behaviour in Oracle where I would expect ORA-00918 to be raised, but isn’t. Take this query, for example.

SELECT *
FROM USER_TABLES TAB
JOIN USER_TRIGGERS TRG ON TRG.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED'

This query is notionally looking for the details of tables with disabled triggers, but please note that this is not the problem I’m trying to solve. The problem is not unique to this query, the data dictionary, views or tables; as far as I can tell it applies to any set of tables or views (from the two or three I’ve tried).

Anyway, try to run this query and you get ORA-00918 because both USER_TABLES and USER_TRIGGERS have a column called STATUS so to get the query to run the WHERE clause needs to be changed to TRG.STATUS. Ok, cool, but try instead joining another table.

SELECT *
FROM USER_TABLES TAB
JOIN USER_TRIGGERS TRG ON TRG.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
JOIN USER_CONSTRAINTS CON ON CON.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED'

This query, without qualifying which STATUS column you mean, magically works! Never mind the semantics or what the query returns, there is no error. USER_CONSTRAINTS even has a column called STATUS too, so how come it doesn’t know what to do when there are two columns to choose from but it’s okay with even more ambiguity?

This is all on 10.2.0.3.0 by the way, and in essence ORA-00918 stops being raised if you have more than two tables in your query. If this is an Oracle bug, does anyone know when it was fixed and so which Oracle version is likely to cause cowboy queries to blow up if our database is upgraded?

Update

Thanks to BQ for demonstrating the bug is fixed in 11.2.0.1.0. Bounty for anyone that can show it fixed in an earlier version!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T06:57:17+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 6:57 am

    Can’t say when it was fixed, but here’s my results:

    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP,
    Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    
    SQL> SELECT *
      2  FROM USER_TABLES TAB
      3  JOIN USER_TRIGGERS TRG ON TRG.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
      4  WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED';
    WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED'
          *
    ERROR at line 4:
    ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined
    
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
    
      1  SELECT *
      2  FROM USER_TABLES TAB
      3  JOIN USER_TRIGGERS TRG ON TRG.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
      4  JOIN USER_CONSTRAINTS CON ON CON.TABLE_NAME = TAB.TABLE_NAME
      5* WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED'
    SQL> /
    WHERE STATUS = 'DISABLED'
          *
    ERROR at line 5:
    ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
This could be a duplicate question, but I have no idea what search terms
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.