Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7902449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T09:29:46+00:00 2026-06-03T09:29:46+00:00

I’ve just started working at a new company and noticed something that looks completely

  • 0

I’ve just started working at a new company and noticed something that looks completely wrong to me in a lot of their JS. I’m a bit hesitant to bring it up without confirming this is wrong since I’m pretty junior, I’m not a JS expert and it’s only my second day and I don’t want to look stupid.

So, normally I’d expect the module pattern to look something like:

MODULENAME = MODULENAME || {};

MODULENAME.SUBMODULENAME = (function() {
    var bla = {};

    bla.somefunction = function() {
        //do stuff
    };

    //add more stuff to bla
    return bla;
}());

What they have all over their code is:

MODULENAME = MODULENAME || {};

MODULENAME.SUBMODULENAME = (function() {
    var that = this;

    that.somefunction = function() {
        //do stuff
    };

    //add more stuff to that
    return that;
}());

Now of course because the function isn’t being called as a constructor with the new keyword or as a method, this is bound to window and they’re defining that as this. So they’re basically dumping everything in the global object and all their sub-module names are in fact aliases for window. Is there any reason anyone would want to do this? Or is this really as wrong as it seems to me?

Edit:

I made a mistake in putting var before the submodule definition, originally I wrote something slightly different and forgot to delete the var. I’ve tried to make the example a bit clearer too, hopefully it’s more obvious what I mean now.

Edit 2:

Also I’ve looked at the scripts executing in Firebug and they are definitely adding everything to window, that object is a total mess.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T09:29:48+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 9:29 am

    Yes it looks wrong.

    MODULENAME = MODULENAME || {}; // missing var
    
    var MODULENAME.SUBMODULENAME = (function() { // probably the missing var from above...
        var that = this;
        //add some stuff to that
        return that; // that is the WINDOW- wrong.
    }());
    

    DEMO for the damage it can do:

    var x = function() {
        alert('out');
    }
    var MODULENAME = MODULENAME || {};
    
    MODULENAME.SUBMODULENAME = (function() {
        var that = this;
        that.x = function() {
            alert('DAMAGE');
        }
    }());
    
    x();​ // alert DAMAGE and not "out" - messed up with the global object!
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm working with an upstream system that sometimes sends me text destined for HTML/XML
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.