Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8808177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T02:33:23+00:00 2026-06-14T02:33:23+00:00

I’ve managed to get a version of Eulers Totient Function working, albeit one that

  • 0

I’ve managed to get a version of Eulers Totient Function working, albeit one that works for smaller numbers (smaller here being smaller compared to the 1024 bit numbers I need it to calculate)

My version is here –

public static BigInteger eulerTotientBigInt(BigInteger calculate) { 

    BigInteger count = new BigInteger("0");
    for(BigInteger i = new BigInteger("1"); i.compareTo(calculate) < 0; i = i.add(BigInteger.ONE)) { 
        BigInteger check = GCD(calculate,i);

        if(check.compareTo(BigInteger.ONE)==0)  {//coprime
            count = count.add(BigInteger.ONE);          
        }
    }
    return count;
}

While this works for smaller numbers, it works by iterating through every possible from 1 to the number being calculated. With large BigIntegers, this is totally unfeasible.

I’ve read that it’s possible to divide the number on each iteration, removing the need to go through them one by one. I’m just not sure what I’m supposed to divide by what (some of the examples I’ve looked at are in C and use longs and a square root – as far as I know I can’t calculate an accurate an accurate square root of a BigInteger. I’m also wondering that if for modular arithmetic such as this, does the function need to include an argument stating what the mod is. I’m totally unsure on that so any advice much appreciated.

Can anyone point me in the right direction here?

PS I deleted this question when I found modifying Euler Totient Function. I adapted it to work with BigIntegers –

public static BigInteger etfBig(BigInteger n) {

    BigInteger result = n;
    BigInteger i;

    for(i = new BigInteger("2"); (i.multiply(i)).compareTo(n) <= 0; i = i.add(BigInteger.ONE)) {
         if((n.mod(i)).compareTo(BigInteger.ZERO) == 0) 
         result = result.divide(i);
         while(n.mod(i).compareTo(BigInteger.ZERO)== 0 ) 
             n = n.divide(i);
     }      
 if(n.compareTo(BigInteger.ONE) > 0)
 result = result.subtract((result.divide(n)));
 return result;
}

And it does give an accurate result, bit when passed a 1024 bit number it runs forever (I’m still not sure if it even finished, it’s been running for 20 minutes).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T02:33:25+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 2:33 am

    The algorithm you are trying to write is equivalent to factoring the argument n, which means you should expect it to run forever, practically speaking until either your computer dies or you die. See this post in mathoverflow for more information: How hard is it to compute the Euler totient function?.

    If, on the other hand, you want the value of the totient for some large number for which you have the factorization, pass the argument as sequence of (prime, exponent) pairs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I'm working with an upstream system that sometimes sends me text destined for HTML/XML
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.