Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8883585
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T20:50:56+00:00 2026-06-14T20:50:56+00:00

I’ve noticed different ways to add functions to "classes" in various tutorials. The first

  • 0

I’ve noticed different ways to add functions to "classes" in various tutorials. The first is inside the class’ constructor:

Class = function () {
    this.doSomething = function() {...};
}

The other one is:

Class = function () {}
Class.prototype.doSomething  = function() {...};

In which situations should one be used over the other?

Is my understanding that there are no protected properties or methods in Javascript correct? If so, what should be used instead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T20:50:58+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 8:50 pm

    When you define a function inside the constructor as this.myFunction=..., it is specific to your instance. This means that it must be constructed and kept in memory for all instances, which may be heavy. It also can’t be inherited .

    The only valid reason to do this are :

    • the enclosing of specific values
    • other types of specific functions (you might build a different function each time)

    Most often, what you really need is a function defined on the prototype.

    From the MDN on objects :

    All objects in JavaScript are descended from Object; all objects
    inherit methods and properties from Object.prototype, although they
    may be overridden. For example, other constructors’ prototypes
    override the constructor property and provide their own toString
    methods. Changes to the Object prototype object are propagated to all
    objects unless the properties and methods subject to those changes are
    overridden further along the prototype chain.

    Regarding your additional question : the following code builds a non directly accessible function :

    Class = function () {
       var imprivate = function(){...};
       this.doSomething = function() { uses imprivate};
    }
    

    A downside is that you have a different function instance for each instance of Class. This is most often done for modules (from which you have only one instance). Personally, I prefer to do exactly as suggested by ThiefMaster in comment : I prefix my private functions with _ :

    // private method
    XBasedGrapher.prototype._ensureInit = function() {
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've tracked down a weird MySQL problem to the two different ways I was
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I
I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.