Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6558161
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T13:09:57+00:00 2026-05-25T13:09:57+00:00

I’ve noticed many languages like Ruby and CofeeScript (well a transcompiler) support everything being

  • 0

I’ve noticed many languages like Ruby and CofeeScript (well a transcompiler) support everything being an expression.

Now it makes the language somewhat simple to understand and definitely seems neat at the surface, but I was looking maybe for some scholarly publications about the positives and negatives of the two approaches.

It would be beneficial if the publications had clear examples that compared the benefits of having everything be an expression vs., well, not.

Examples in CoffeeScript vs Javascript would be nice, but not required.

The concept is definitely cool, but I’m still slightly unsure how revolutionary the whole idea really is (obviously something being revolutionary is somewhat an opinion).

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T13:09:57+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:09 pm

    There is nothing revolutionary about this per se. The expression-oriented approach is a functional programming technique.

    Expression-oriented code is simpler and less cluttered than statement-oriented code, because of fewer assignments and no explicit return statements. The lack of distinction between expressions and commands enables conceptual uniformity (see Referential transparency) and bottom-up structure.

    Some modern languages have adopted functional programming concepts (e.g. C#, Python, Ruby).

    Some scholarly insight on the benefits of functional practices:

    • Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? A Functional Style and Its Algebra of Programs – John Backus

    Interesting articles:

    • Why Functional Programming is Important in a Mixed Environment
    • Is C# becoming a functional language?

    As to the comment about performance concerns, the possible overhead related to choice of paradigm is probably negligible. Even in C, most statements evaluate as an expression – however, a comparison between a compiled language (C) and an interpreted language (CoffeeScript) is rather useless.

    On a theoretical note, an imperative language represents the control flow in more of a machine-oriented way, which may allow for easier hand-optimization than a functional language.

    Language performance and its significance depend heavily on the use case. Concerning JavaScript and whatever code transformation on top of it, this performance discussion is completely irrelevant. The gains in productivity outweigh any slight performance hit.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.