Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 945287
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T22:43:42+00:00 2026-05-15T22:43:42+00:00

I’ve previously asked how long it takes for a winning combination to appear on

  • 0

I’ve previously asked how long it takes for a winning combination to appear on Google’s Web Optimizer, but now I have another weird problem during an A/B test:

For the past two days has Google announced that there was a “High Confidence Winner” that had a 98.5% chance of beating the original variation by 27.4%. Great!

alt text

I decided to leave it running to make absolutely sure, but something weird happened: Today Google is saying that they “haven’t collected enough data yet to show any significant results” (as shown below). Sure, the figures have changed slightly, but they’re still very high: 96.6% chance of beating the original by 22%.

alt text

So, why is Google not so sure now?

How could it have gone from having a statistically significant “High Confidence” winner, to not having enough data to calculate one? Are my numbers too tiny for Google to be absolutely sure or something?

Thanks for any insights!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T22:43:43+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:43 pm

    How could it have gone from having a
    statistically significant “High
    Confidence” winner, to not having
    enough data to calculate one?

    With all statistics tests there is what’s called a p-value, which is the probablity of obtaining the observed result by random chance, assuming that there is no difference between what’s being tested. So when you run a test, you want a small p-value so that you can be confident with your results.

    So with GWO must have a p-value between 1.5% and 3.4% (I’m guessing it’s 2.5%, atleast in this case, it might be that it depends on the number of combinations)

    So when (100% – chance to beat %) > p-value, then GWO will say that it has not collected enough information, and if a combination has a (100% – chance to beat %) < p-value then a winner is found. Obviously if that line is just crossed, then it could easily go back with a little more data.

    To summerize, you shouldn’t be checking the results frequently, you should setup a test, then ignore it for a long while then check the results.

    Are my numbers too tiny for Google to
    be absolutely sure or something?

    No

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.