Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8486787
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T21:03:10+00:00 2026-06-10T21:03:10+00:00

I’ve read a lot of articles on AMD solutions like RequireJS or module loaders

  • 0

I’ve read a lot of articles on AMD solutions like RequireJS or module loaders that follow CommonJS style in Javascript.

Let’s say I have an app splitted in this parts:

  • App definition that rely on the framework i use
  • Model 1 that rely on App definition and framework
  • Model 2 that rely on App definition, Model 1 and my framework

I may write each part as a RequireJS module or a common JS module and split my project in how many files I want but what’s the advantage of writing each part as a module or splitting them in many files and then load them in the right order (to avoid dependency problems) maybe concatenatening all the files in a big one to reduce HTTP requets (as done by r.js optimizer)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T21:03:12+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 9:03 pm

    In my opinion, there are three rather important reasons:

    You can create and re-use modules without polluting the global namespace. The more polluted your global namespace is, the bigger the chance of a function/variable collision. That means you define a function called “foo” and another developer defines the function “foo” = one of the functions gets overwritten.

    You can structure your code into separate folders and files and requirejs will load them asynchronously when needed, so everything just works.

    You can build for production. RequireJS comes with its own build tool called R.JS that will concat and uglify your javascript modules into a single (or multiple) packages. This will improve your page speed as the user will have to make less script calls and load less content (as your JS is uglified).

    You can take a look at this simple demo project: https://c9.io/peeter-tomberg/requirejs (in cloud9ide).

    To build your modules into a single app, all you have to do is have requirejs npm package installed and run the command: r.js -o build/build.properties.js

    If there are any questions, ask away.

    Edit:

    In development, having all modules in separate files is just a good way to structure and manage your code. It also helps you in debugging (e.g. error on “Module.js line 17” instead of “scripts.js line 5373”).

    For production, you should use the build tool to concat and uglify the javascript into a single file. This will help the page load quicker as you are making less requests. Every request you make to load something slows down your page. The slower your page, the less points Google gives you. The slower the page, the more frustrated your users will be. The slower your page, the less sales you will get.

    If you wish to read more about web page performance, look at http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.