Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9157219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T12:57:38+00:00 2026-06-17T12:57:38+00:00

I’ve read an article about using boost::intrusive_ptr for managing COM objects . The author

  • 0

I’ve read an article about using boost::intrusive_ptr for managing COM objects. The author shows a wrapper class which takes care of adjusting the smart pointer for the usual COM semantics. This is the class:

template <typename T>
class WrapPtr
{
public:
    WrapPtr(boost::intrusive_ptr<T>& ref)
    : m_ref(ref), m_ptr(0)
    {
    }
   
    ~WrapPtr()
    {
        // The second parameter indicates that the reference count should not be incremented
        m_ref = boost::intrusive_ptr(m_ptr, false);
    }
   
    operator T**()
    {
        return &m_ptr;
    }
   
    operator void**()
    {
        // Some COM functions ask for a pointer to void pointer, such as QueryInterface
        return reinterpret_cast<void**>(&m_ptr);
    }
   
private:
    T* m_ptr;
    boost::intrusive_ptr<T> m_ref;
};

template <typename T>
WrapPtr<T> AttachPtr(boost::intrusive_ptr<T>& ref)
{
    return WrapPtr<T>(ref);
}

What I don’t understand is the destructor. It will discard the current m_ref object (which will lead to a call to Release of course), but then he assigns a new intrusive_ptr constructed from the m_ptr member. I don’t understand why this is needed in the destructor, since the Wrapper class is holding a copy of the intrusive_ptr, not a reference to it. If the callee changed the pointed object, this change will be lost after the destructor is left. Is this a bug here or am I missing something?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T12:57:40+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 12:57 pm

    In a similar “safe address-of” class I once saw, the class had an intrusive_ptr reference (intrusive_ptr<T>&), not an actual object (intrusive_ptr<T>). The class you posted won’t actually affect the client’s intrusive_ptr. So it looks like the code is just buggy: it should hold a reference to the client’s intrusive_ptr, not a separate intrusive_ptr object:

    template <typename T>
    class WrapPtr
    {
    private:
        T* m_ptr;
        boost::intrusive_ptr<T>& m_ref;
    
        ...
    };
    

    EDIT: I forgot to answer your actual question 🙂

    With the fix above, what the destructor does becomes clearer: it sets the client’s intrusive_ptr to hold the pointer that was set by calling operator T** or operator void** and passing it to a “getter” method (e.g. QueryInterface).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I am using JSon response to parse title,date content and thumbnail images and place
I am trying to find ID3V2 tags from MP3 file using jid3lib in Java.
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I am using the SimpleRSS gem to parse a WordPress RSS feed. The only
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.