Home/ Questions/Q 7158867
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-28T13:08:14+00:00

I’ve read lots about the Microsoft’s threaded apartment model, but I’m still having a

  • 0

I’ve read lots about the Microsoft’s threaded apartment model, but I’m still having a little trouble visualizing it.

Microsoft uses the analogy of living things living in an apartment. So, for STA, consider the following (I know it’s a little silly).

  1. Assume thread = person and COMObject = bacteria. The person lives in the apartment, and the bacteria lives inside the person. So in STA-Land, a thread lives in the STA and the COMObject lives inside the thread, so in order to interact with the COMObject, one must do so by running code on the COMObject’s thread.

  2. Assume thread = person and COMObject = cat. The person lives in the apartment, and the cat lives in the apartment with the person. SO in STA-Land, the thread and the COMObject at the same hierarchical level.

Q1. Which analogy above is correct, or if neither are correct, how would you describe the STA?

Q2. How would you describe the MTA?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I do not like these analogies. They are confusing.

    You create an apartment.

    If it is an STA there will be only one thread in the apartment so all the objects in that apartment will be executed on that single thread (so there is no concurrent execution in the objects in that apartment)

    If it is an MTA there can be multiple threads in that apartment. So the objects in the MTA need to implement the synchronization explicitly if needed.

    An object lives in one apartment. There can be multiple objects in the same apartment.

    A very good read here

    • 0