Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3668564
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T02:08:16+00:00 2026-05-19T02:08:16+00:00

I’ve read some posts here and elsewhere on the web about the differences between

  • 0

I’ve read some posts here and elsewhere on the web about the differences between live() and delegate(). However I haven’t found the answer I’m looking for (if this is a dupe please tell me).

I know that the difference between live and delegate is that live cannot be used in a chain. I also read somewhere that delegate is in some cases faster (better performance).

My question is, is there a situation where you should use live instead of delegate?

UPDATE

I’ve set up a simple test to see the difference in performance.

I’ve also added the new .on() which is available in jQuery 1.7+

The results pretty much sum up the performance issues as stated in the answers.

  • Don’t use .live() unless your jQuery version doesn’t support .delegate().
  • Don’t use .delegate() unless your jQuery version doesn’t support .on().

The difference between .live() and .delegate() is A LOT bigger than between delegate() and .on().

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T02:08:16+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 2:08 am

    I never use live; I consider the benefits of using delegate to be so substantial as to be overwhelming.

    The one benefit of live is that its syntax is very close to that of bind:

    $('a.myClass').live('click', function() { ... });
    

    delegate, however, uses a slightly more verbose syntax:

    $('#containerElement').delegate('a.myClass', 'click', function() { ... });
    

    This, however, seems to me to be much more explicit about what is actually happening. You don’t realise from the live example that the events are actually being captured on document; with delegate, it is clear that the event capturing happens on #containerElement. You can do the same thing with live, but the syntax becomes increasingly horrid.

    Specifying a context for your events to be captured also improves performance. With the live example, every single click on the entire document has to be compared with the selector a.myClass to see if it matches. With delegate, that is only the elements within #containerElement. This will obviously improve performance.

    Finally, live requires that your browser looks for a.myClass whether or not it currently exists. delegate only looks for the elements when the events are triggered, giving a further performance advantage.


    NB delegate uses live behind the scenes, so you can do anything with live that you can do with delegate. My answer deals with them as they are commonly used.

    Note also that neither live nor delegate is the best way to do event delegation in modern jQuery. The new syntax (as of jQuery 1.7) is with the on function. The syntax is as follows:

    $('#containerElement').on('click', 'a.myClass', function() { ... });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.