Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6337713
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T19:18:11+00:00 2026-05-24T19:18:11+00:00

I’ve recently been assigned to a release engineering team in an effort to make

  • 0

I’ve recently been assigned to a release engineering team in an effort to make our build process more managable. In our product’s history, we simply built everything in our version control repository with every build since it wasn’t that much of a timesink to do so. This includes third-party products for which we have source (including Enterprise Library, for example), our own in-house framework code, and finally the product itself. After several years of steady product growth, however, this has become a very cumbersome process.

That said, we’d like to establish a sort of tiered build system wherein only the products (which change every day) are built on a daily basis, while our framework code (which changes much less often) and our thirdparty code (almost never) are built only when they change. We have a symbol & source server set up to facilitate debugging code such as our framework libraries that aren’t newly built which each version, but we’re still figuring out how to facilitate this. For the record, we use TFVC for source control.

My questions are these: what kinds of practices are used for this kind of thing? Do we set up separate team projects for each “tier” of this build (i.e. team project for thirdparty, for framework, for products) and branch them into one another? Do we ever check in the build products of one tier into the next to ensure dependencies resolve? If not, where do the binaries live? Would these requirements demand that we use the GAC?

Finally, if there is any guidance about this kind of thing I’ve love to do some reading; but, as I’m new to build/release engineering, I don’t yet know where to look.

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T19:18:13+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 7:18 pm

    To answer your last question first, there’s an excellent book from Microsoft about build configuration and management.

    With regards to your first question: We handle our dependencies separately. We have a build that compiles our framework. We have another build that compiles our own projects.

    However, as a part of the process of our second build, we install the setup from our framework build on the buildmachine before compiling our own project.

    This way, we can release our framework separately from our projects. Our projects can determine (by modifying the build configuration) when to start using a new version.

    The project and the framework have their own TFS projects.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains
I have thousands of HTML files to process using Groovy/Java and I need to
In my XML file chapters tag has more chapter tag.i need to display chapters
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.