Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6907361
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:25:31+00:00 2026-05-27T08:25:31+00:00

I’ve recently learnt about interface blocks when adding a function to my Fortran program.

  • 0

I’ve recently learnt about interface blocks when adding a function to my Fortran program. Everything works nice and neatly, but now I want to add a second function into the interface block.

Here is my interface block:

interface
    function correctNeighLabel (A,i,j,k)
    integer :: correctNeighLabel
    integer, intent(in) :: i,j,k
    integer,dimension(:,:,:),intent(inout) :: A
    end function

    function correctNeighArray (B,d,e,f)
        character :: correctNeighArray
    integer, intent(in) :: d,e,f
    character, dimension(:,:,:),intent(inout) :: B
    end function
end interface

It appears to me that this may not be the best option.

I’ve looked into subroutines, but I’m not very confident that it’s the right solution. What I’m doing is relatively simple, and I need to pass arguments to the subroutine, but all the subroutines I’ve seen are a) complicated (i.e. too complicated for a function), and b) don’t take arguments. They behave as though they manipulate variables without them being passed to them.

I’ve not really looked into modules properly, but from what I’ve seen it’s not the right thing to use.

Which should I use when, and how do I go about it best?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:25:31+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:25 am

    Modules are always the right thing to use 😉

    If you have a very simple F90 program you can include functions and subroutines in the ‘contains’ block:

     program simple
       implicit none
       integer :: x, y
       x = ...
       y = myfunc(x)
     contains
       function myfunc(x) result(y)
         implicit none
         integer, intent(in)  :: x
         integer              :: y
         ...
       end function myfunc
     end program
    

    Then the interface of the functions/subroutines will be known in the program and don’t need to be defined in an interface block.

    For more complex programs you should keep all functions/subroutines in modules and load them when required. So you don’t need to define interfaces, either:

     module mymod
       implicit none
       private
       public :: myfunc
     contains
       function myfunc(x) result(y)
         implicit none
         integer, intent(in)  :: x
         integer              :: y
         ...
       end function myfunc
     end module mymod
    
     program advanced
       use mymod, only: myfunc
       implicit none
       integer :: x, y
       x = ...
       y = myfunc(x)
     end program advanced
    

    The module and the program can (actually should) be in separate files, but the module has to be compiled before the actual program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.