Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 466847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T23:31:17+00:00 2026-05-12T23:31:17+00:00

I’ve seen many examples for animating the background-position of elements to produce nice looking

  • 0

I’ve seen many examples for animating the background-position of elements to produce nice looking scrolling backgrounds.

These examples tend to also script in reset counters to put the background-position in its original location after a certain amount of pixels.

My question is: Is it feasible to never reset the background-position for a tiled background? This would naturally produce very large background-position values over time, but if there is no significant difference in browser performance, it might be ok. I’ve tested IE, Firefox, and Chrome over an 8 hour period, and there didn’t appear to be any negative impact, although my boxes are relatively fast.

To answer the “why not reset?” question, it just comes down to simplicity. I am animating many background elements, each with different X/Y ratios, so not having to calculate when exactly it would be pixel perfect timing to switch back would make my life easier.

Anyone have thoughts on this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T23:31:18+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:31 pm

    This would naturally produce very large background-position values over time

    Yes, that could eventually become a problem if your code is like

    el.style.backgroundPosition= '0 '+n+'px';
    

    When n reaches a high number (typically 1000000000000000000000), its toString will switch to exponential representation, which would end up trying to set:

    el.style.backgroundPosition= '0 1e21px';
    

    which is an obvious error. It’s possible some layout engines might bail out earlier, perhaps at 1<<31 pixels. But even so, if you were animating something by (say) 32 pixels 60 times a second, it would still take twelve days to reach that stage.

    not having to calculate when exactly it would be pixel perfect timing to switch back would make my life easier.

    Typically you’d use the modulo operator % separately on each counter rather than resetting the whole thing.

    var framen1= 30;     // item 1 has 30 frames of animation
    var framen2= 50;     // item 2 has 50 frames of animation
        ...
    var framei1= (framei1+1)%framen1; // 0 to 29 then reset
    var framei2= (framei2+1)%framen2; // 0 to 49 then reset
    

    Or, for time-based animations:

    var frametime1= 100; // item 1 updates 10 times a second
    var frametime2= 40;  // item 2 updates 25 times a second
        ...
    
    var dt= new Date()-t0; // get time since started animation
    
    var framei1= Math.floor(dt/frametime1) % framen1;
    var framei2= Math.floor(dt/framelength2) % numberofframes2;
    
    document.getElementById('div1').style.backgroundPosition= '0 '+(framei1*24)+'px';
    document.getElementById('div2').style.backgroundPosition= '0 '+(framei2*24)+'px';
       ...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.