Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8985533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T21:21:06+00:00 2026-06-15T21:21:06+00:00

I’ve seen other questions about getting objects from Set ‘s based on index value

  • 0

I’ve seen other questions about getting objects from Set‘s based on index value and I understand why that is not possible. But I haven’t been able to find a good explanation for why a get by object is not allowed so thought I would ask.

HashSet is backed by a HashMap so getting an object from it should be pretty straightforward. As it is now, it appears I would have to iterate over each item in the HashSet and test for equality which seems unnecessary.

I could just use a Map but I have no need for a key:value pair, I just need a Set.

For example say I have Foo.java:

package example;

import java.io.Serializable;

public class Foo implements Serializable {

    String _id;
    String _description;

    public Foo(String id){
        this._id = id
    }

    public void setDescription(String description){
        this._description = description;
    }

    public String getDescription(){
        return this._description;
    }

    public boolean equals(Object obj) {
        //equals code, checks if id's are equal
    }

    public int hashCode() {
        //hash code calculation
    }

}

and Example.java:

package example;

import java.util.HashSet;

public class Example {

    public static void main(String[] args){
        HashSet<Foo> set = new HashSet<Foo>();

        Foo foo1 = new Foo("1");
        foo1.setDescription("Number 1");

        set.add(foo1);
        set.add(new Foo("2"));

        //I want to get the object stored in the Set, so I construct a object that is 'equal' to the one I want.
        Foo theFoo = set.get(new Foo("1")); //Is there a reason this is not allowed?
        System.out.println(theFoo.getDescription); //Should print Number 1
    }

}

Is it because the equals method is meant to test for “absolute” equality rather than “logical” equality (in which case contains(Object o) would be sufficient)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T21:21:08+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 9:21 pm

    A Set is a Collection of objects which treats a.equals(b) == true as duplicates, so it doesn’t make sense to try to get the same object you already have.

    If you are trying to get(Object) from a collection, a Map is likely to be more appropriate.

    What you should write is

    Map<String, String> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();
    
    map.put("1", "Number 1");
    map.put("2", null);
    String description = map.get("1");
    

    if an object is not in the set (based on equals), add it, if it is in the set (based on equals) give me the set’s instance of that object

    In the unlikely event you need this you can use a Map.

    Map<Bar, Bar> map = // LinkedHashMap or ConcurrentHashMap
    
    Bar bar1 = new Bar(1);
    map.put(bar1, bar1);
    
    Bar bar1a = map.get(new Bar(1));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.