Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 179471
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:24:47+00:00 2026-05-11T14:24:47+00:00

I’ve used both CppUnit and boost::test for C++ unittesting. Generally I prefer boost::test ,

  • 0

I’ve used both CppUnit and boost::test for C++ unittesting. Generally I prefer boost::test, mainly because the auto-test macros minimise the effort to setup tests. But there’s one thing I really miss from CppUnit: the ability to register your own ‘protectors’, instances of which automatically wrap all the run tests. (Technically, you install a test ‘listener’, and that can wrap each test in a protector scope).

I’ve found these invaluable in the past for monitoring unittests for unexpected side effects (e.g checking code hasn’t changed the floating-point unit state flags). I can’t see any equivalent in the boost::test documentation, although BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE maybe comes closest.

Any suggestions for how to best achieve the same thing as CppUnit’s protectors in boost::test ?

(I haven’t really looked into boost::test‘s implementation yet, but if it’s anything like CppUnit it must use something very like protectors itself).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:24:47+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:24 pm

    I’ve never used CppUnit, so not sure how protectors work. Are you looking for something that wraps individual tests, or the entire test suite?

    For the former, you could use fixtures as you mention, but as I understand it, fixtures should be considered ‘outside’ the test. They set up whatever the test needs, and cleans it up afterwards. Any actual error-testing should be in the test itself, but can be easily implemented with RAII. Simply define a class which checks whatever you need in its destructor, and then create a local instance of it at the beginning of the test. Since it is constructed first, it gets destructed last, so it can easily check that the test hasn’t modified any unexpected state.

    If you want it to check this after all the tests have executed, you probably want global fixtures

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I find it surprising that it's so hard to remove.… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer AFAIK, the regular licence for VS is for the user,… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The best way to improve the performance of resizing is,… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.