Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 984533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:02:02+00:00 2026-05-16T05:02:02+00:00

I’ve written a remote Python debugger and one of the features I need is

  • 0

I’ve written a remote Python debugger and one of the features I need is to execute arbitrary code while stopped at a breakpoint. My debugger uses the following to execute code received from the remote debugger:

exec (compile(code, '<string>', 'single') , frame.f_globals, frame.f_locals)

This works fine for the most part, but I’ve noticed a couple issues.

  1. Assignment statements aren’t actually applied to the original locals dictionary. This is probably due to the fact that f_locals is supposed to be read-only.

  2. If stopped within a class method, accessing protected attributes (names beginning with double underscore) does not work. I’m assuming this is due to the name mangling that Python performs on protected attributes.

So my question is, is there a way around these limitations? Can I trick Python into thinking that the code is being executed in the actual local scope of that frame?

I’m using CPython 2.7, and I’m willing to accept a solution/hack specific to this version.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:02:02+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:02 am

    Assignment statements aren’t actually
    applied to the original locals
    dictionary. This is probably due to
    the fact that f_locals is supposed to
    be read-only.

    Not exactly, but the bytecode for the function will not look at locals, using rather a simple but crucial optimization whereby local variables are in a simple array, avoiding runtime lookups. The only way to avoid this (and make the function much, much slower) is compiling different code, e.g. code starting with an exec '' to force the compiler to avoid the optimization (in Python 2; no way, in Python 3). If you need to work with existing bytecode, you’re out of luck: there is no way to accomplish what you desire.

    If stopped within a class method,
    accessing protected attributes (names
    beginning with double underscore) does
    not work. I’m assuming this is due to
    the name mangling that Python performs
    on protected attributes.

    Yep, so this issue does allow a workaround: prepend _Classname to the name to mimic what the compiler does. Note that double-underscore prefixes means private: protected would be a single underscore (and would give you no trouble). Private names are specifically meant to avoid accidental classes with names bound in subclasses (and work decently for that one purpose, though not perfectly, and not for anything else;-).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
In my XML file chapters tag has more chapter tag.i need to display chapters
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I have thousands of HTML files to process using Groovy/Java and I need to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.