Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7715849
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T02:29:23+00:00 2026-06-01T02:29:23+00:00

Javascript has a poorly constructed but convenient arguments variable inside every function, such that

  • 0

Javascript has a poorly constructed but convenient “arguments” variable inside every function, such that you can pass arguments through a function like so:

function foo(a, b, c) {
    return bar.apply(this, arguments);
}
function bar(a, b, c) {
    return [a, b, c];
}
foo(2, 3, 5);    // returns [2, 3, 5]

Is there an easy way to do a similar thing in Python?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T02:29:25+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 2:29 am

    Yeah, this is what I should have said.

    def foo(*args):
        return bar(*args)
    

    You don’t need to declare the function with (a,b,c). bar(…) will get whatever foo(…) gets.

    My other crummier answer is below:


    I was so close to answering “No, it can’t easily be done” but with a few extra lines, I think it can.
    @cbrauchli great idea using locals(), but since locals() also returns local variables, if we do

    def foo(a,b,c):
        n = "foobar" # any code that declares local variables will affect locals()
        return bar(**locals())
    

    we’ll be passing an unwanted 4th argument, n, to bar(a,b,c) and we’ll get an error. To solve this, you’d want to do something like arguments = locals() in the very first line i.e.

    def foo(a, b, c):
        myargs = locals() # at this point, locals only has a,b,c
        total = a + b + c # we can do what we like until the end
        return bar(**myargs) # turn the dictionary of a,b,c into a keyword list using **
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some third-party Javascript that has statements like this: FOO = function() {
PHP has a func_get_args() for getting all function arguments, and JavaScript has the functions
David Flanagan's excellent book on JavaScript has an example that shows how to perform
I have a JavaScript resource that has the possibility of being edited at any
I'm writing a JavaSCript class that has a method that recursively calls itself. Scheduler.prototype.updateTimer
I have a simple JavaScript file that has three jQuery $document.ready functions. All three
For a little while now javascript has the map function to loop over arrays.
Javascript has an overload for string.replace(...) that takes a Regular Expression and a callback
I was wondering why JavaScript has such a confusing API. It is not consistent
Will Ruby ever see a performance boost as Javascript has seen recently? Can a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.