Joins can be always expressed as subqueries, and vice versa may not be possible. As joins are symmetric. Can anyone provide me an example for this statement.
As I am unable to get it fully.
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m not sure the first statement is true anyway.
For example:
How does one express the nature of a cross join using x and a subquery based on y?
Or even a triangular join:
So the first statement must be restricted to cases where there are at most one rows joining so that you can use a scalar subquery?