EDIT: Trying to achieve the opposite of this.
(instead of 2 fixed-width divs on the sides and one fluid-width div in the middle,
I’m trying to get 2 fluid-width divs on the sides and one div centered in the middle)
I have 3 divs: A, B, and C.
B needs to sit centered between A and C.

What I’m currently doing is pretty much matching what’s going on above. But, if A, B, and C’s container has an odd width, some browsers are rounding A and C’s widths down and others up (leaving C 1px too long and 1px too short, respectively).
notice the extra pixel to the right of C

notice the space to the right of C is a pixel thinner.

I don’t care how many nested divs I need, but I’ve been spending way too much time on this! If someone already has a sure-fire solution to this problem, please share!
notes:
– A, B, and C’s parent can’t have overflow hidden.
– A, B, and C can’t overlap (they have translucent png’s)
This is my starting point: JSFIDDLE
Here are two ways that work, both with caveats (warning, both require a wrapper):
HTML
Base CSS
CSS3 Approach:
Caveat: Only supported (so far) in Firefox and Webkit (Chrome/Safari), both requiring prefixed rules. The above is what it will be someday.
Here is a demo with prefixes: http://jsfiddle.net/crazytonyi/cBVTE/
Table-Display approach
Caveats: IE didn’t start supporting this display type until 7 or 8. On the other hand, worrying about users on older versions of IE is like worrying about people who still turn off cookies and javascript. Either they catch up or get used to pages breaking. End the pandering!
Here’s a demo using the above: http://jsfiddle.net/crazytonyi/kM46h/
In both cases, no floats or positioning needed, just willingness to give the middle finger to older browsers. How old depends on which method you choose.