Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8140817
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T12:17:27+00:00 2026-06-06T12:17:27+00:00

Just curious if it is syntactically possible to do something like this: static (void)

  • 0

Just curious if it is syntactically possible to do something like this:

static (void) someFunc();

instead of, say,

static bla = someFunc();

so as to invoke someFunc only once when we go through that section of code? The (void) snippet doesn’t compile by the way.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T12:17:29+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 12:17 pm

    No, static is intended only to work with value initialization.

    To document that you aren’t interested in the return value, you could write:

    static int unused = (someFunc(), void(), 0);
    

    The void() is to prevent a comma operator being called; you could also write (void(someFunc()), 0) using a functional cast.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just curious to know what the best practice would be for something like this:
Just curious here: is it possible to invoke a Windows Blue Screen of Death
Just curious, is there a format string I can use to output something like
Just curious if it's possible to make this query any faster? or if there
Just curious how you would comment this line of code: string customerNm = customerNm.EndsWith(s)
Just curious. I heard something about the new G1GC addressing that latency problem. I
Just curious (maybe this is an implementation detail so you may not know) but
Just curious whether it's possible to mirror databases across versions.
just curious how to rewrite the following function to be called only once during
Just curious if this is the way to do this, just want to make

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.