Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4046028
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T13:30:36+00:00 2026-05-20T13:30:36+00:00

Just so it’s known, this question is mostly academic, even though I tried to

  • 0

Just so it’s known, this question is mostly academic, even though I tried to use the concept in a real-world solution. I realize the example is contrived, but I believe the concept is valid.

I want to write some fluent code like this:

copy(my_first_file).to(my_second_file)

Short, easy to read and understand, perfectly legit. So I define my copy method like this:

Private Function copy(FilePath as String) As Object
  Return New With {.to = New Action(Of String)(Function(x) my_real_copy_method(FilePath,x))}
End Function

I realize that I can’t force an anonymous type into a specific type (like implementing an interface or some other class), and I don’t want the overhead of defining a specific class just to match my desired fluent name with the actual method name. So I was able to make the code work like this:

copy(my_first_file).to.Invoke(my_second_file)

So there is no IntelliSense or type awareness there, and I have to include the Invoke in order to have the method run. How can I get more type safety and exclude the Invoke method, under these constraints:

  • Anonymous Type returned from Method
  • No additional classes or interfaces
  • Preferably, I do not want to pass in another parameter to the copy() method that tells what type to return, unless copy becomes a generic method (but I think that means defining another class/interface, which I don’t want to do)

I know that sounds pretty demanding, feel free to call “Bull” if I’m being to difficult!

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T13:30:37+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:30 pm

    Since VB has no return type inference for generic methods, even where there is no ambiguity, there is no way of doing this.

    You can have a strongly typed function that returns an anonymous type using generics but you cannot call it with inferred generics, you need to specify them explicitly.

    Private Function Copy(Of T)(filePath as String, prototype As T) As T
        Return New With { .To = … }
    End Function
    

    (Naming convention adapted to .NET)

    This must be called as follows:

    Dim nullAction As Action(Of String) = Nothing
    Dim proto = New With { .To = nullAction }
    Copy(firstFile, proto).To(secondFile)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just found this out, so i am answering my own question :) Use a
Just looking for the first step basic solution here that keeps the honest people
just a quick question: I am a CS undergrad and have only had experience
Just what the title says, I need to change the password for an existing
Just bought a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac with 2GB of memory and
Just getting my head around Ruby metaprogramming. The mixin/modules always manage to confuse me.
Just how much slower are events? I have written a streaming XML parser (that
just wondering if anyone knows of a truly restful Put/delete implementation asp.net mvc preview
Just installed the latest SDK for iPhone 2.1. When I go to File ->
Just like it reads.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.