Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1116367

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T03:33:04+00:00 2026-05-17T03:33:04+00:00

Just wondering whether an object can self-destruct. Consider this situation. An object that extends

  • 0

Just wondering whether an object can self-destruct.

Consider this situation.

An object that extends a thread object.

Session : Thread
{
  Session() {}
  ~Session() {}

  ThreadMain()
  {
     while(!done){
       /* do stuff ... */
       ... 
       // something sets done = true;
     }

     ~Client();
  }
};


void start_session()
{
   Session* c = new Session();
   Session->Start();
   // when I exit here, I've lost my reference to s.  But if the object
   // self destructs when done, I don't need it right?
}

Somewhere along the way, we have a function called start_session which starts a session.
Eventually the session ends.

In the conventional approach I would have to have some sort of list of Session objects
placed in that list after calling new.

To clean up the objects I’d have to figure out which ones are finished and call a cleanup
function later.

I thought it might make more sense if they could just clean up themselves. Can that be done?

Why? why not? better approaches?

  • 0 0 Answers
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Sidebar

Related Questions

(please excuse that I didn't use aliases). I would like my query output to
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation
My question is about memory use and objects in actionscript 2. If I have
I'm working on a project in C# w/ XNA, and I want to reorganize
I am playing with TFS 2010, and am trying to setup a build process
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.