Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 137491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:06:52+00:00 2026-05-11T07:06:52+00:00

killall -r -9 . sends the 9 signal to all processes matching the .

  • 0

killall -r -9 . sends the 9 signal to all processes matching the . regular expression (i.e. it kills all processes). As it kills itself, the question is, will it kill itself last, therefore doing what it is documented to do, or maybe it will kill himself before finishing the work, leaving processes alive.

Following @David’s answer, it means that if you run killall twice it has less chances of working than if you run it once – because each killall can kill the other before it finishes working.

Is this a new paradox, akin to the halting problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:06:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:06 am

    The man page says that killall will never kill itself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to kill all processes that I get by: ps aux | grep
I need to make a function that can kill all processes owned by user
In my company I have seen use killall -9 to kill daemons and then
Is there an easy method to kill all links on a Wordpress page? I'm
I am trying to kill any firefox processes running on my system as part
I want to know if jquery empty kill all the live events. http://api.jquery.com/empty/ I
How can I kill all my postgresql connections? I'm trying a rake db:drop but
We've reproduced this one in Test, so I feel good about asking this question
I went through this similar question at https://stackoverflow.com/a/7410228/880040 and the 6th thing to check,
I want my program to react on being killed by the 'killall myApplication' command.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.