Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6230967
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T09:50:52+00:00 2026-05-24T09:50:52+00:00

Knowing an RPC call to a server method that returns unit is a message

  • 0

Knowing an RPC call to a server method that returns unit is a message passing call, I want to force the call to be asynchronous and be able to fire the next server call only after the first one has gone to the server.

Server code:

[<Rpc>]
let FirstCall value =
    printfn "%s" value
    async.Zero()

[<Rpc>]
let SecondCall() =
    "test"

Client code:

|>! OnClick (fun _ _ -> async {
                            do! Server.FirstCall "test"
                            do Server.SecondCall() |> ignore
                        } |> Async.Start)

This seems to crash on the client since returning unit, replacing the server and client code to:

[<Rpc>]
let FirstCall value =
    printfn "%s" value
    async { return () }

let! _ = Server.FirstCall "test"

Didn’t fix the problem, while the following did:

[<Rpc>]
let FirstCall value =
    printfn "%s" value
    async { return "" }

let! _ = Server.FirstCall "test"

Is there another way to force a message passing call to be asynchronous instead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T09:50:52+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:50 am

    This is most definitely a bug. I added it here:

    https://bugs.intellifactory.com/websharper/show_bug.cgi?id=468

    Your approach is completely legit. Your workaround is also probably the best for now, e.g. instead of returning Async<unit> return Async<int> with a zero and ignore it.

    We are busy with preparing the 2.4 release due next week and the fix will make it there. Thanks!

    Also, in 2.4 we’ll be dropping synchronous calls, so you will have to use Async throughout for RPC, as discussed in https://bugs.intellifactory.com/websharper/show_bug.cgi?id=467 — primarily motivated by new targets (Android and WP7) that do not support sync AJAX.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to invoke a method without knowing a priori what will the amount
I was just trying this knowing that my select would return one row. Is
upon knowing that parent>div CSS selector is not recognizable in IE, i re-code my
I am interested in knowing if there are any server-side web application frameworks which
I am interested in knowing whether I can expect the observing object's method to
Knowing full well that my InnoDB tables don't support FULLTEXT searches, I'm wondering what
Knowing that anyone can see my AJAX URL string and or forms how can
Knowing that my document.activeElement is an input field (I don't know exactly the name
I was keen on knowing how can I receive calls on a web server
Knowing that EM algorithm as applied to fitting a mixture of Gaussians. Is there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.