Home/ Questions/Q 9186345
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-17T19:30:15+00:00

Let me explain dilemma. I use 3 services from Amazon: EC2, S3 and CloudFront.

  • 0

Let me explain dilemma.
I use 3 services from Amazon: EC2, S3 and CloudFront.
EC2 receives an file as upload, stores it in the S3 bucket. Then CloudFront mirrors the S3 bucket. The only limit is to have user friendly URLs.
Which approach to deliver those files is better?

Client > CloudFront > EC2 > S3

  • Client does a HTTP request to CloudFront URL
  • Cloudfront forwards the request to EC2
  • EC2 translates user friendly URL to raw file URL
  • EC2 reads the file from S3

Client > EC2 … redirect … CloudFront > S3

  • Client does a HTTP request to EC2
  • EC2 translates user friendly URL to raw file URL
  • EC2 redirects to CloudFront, witch mirrors the S3

There are two dimensions for this: the speed and the cost.

I see facebook using the second approach when serving profile images
http://graph.facebook.com/platform/picture

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    You certainly don’t want to force the file transfer between S3 and your client to go through your EC2 instance. That will add load to the EC2 instance, increase bandwidth usage, and undoubtedly slow the response to the user.

    Your EC2 instance gives you the greatest control over URL format, so you’ll want the client to make the initial request to it (to have a “user-friendly” URL). The EC2 instance can just send the client a redirect to the CloudFront or S3 URL that actually has the content, and the client will pull it directly from there without the further involvement of EC2.

    I wouldn’t bother with CloudFront unless you have an enormous number of requests, or network latency has to be as low as possible.

    • 0