Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 908227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:40:59+00:00 2026-05-15T16:40:59+00:00

Let me preface this with the disclaimer that I am very new to multithreading

  • 0

Let me preface this with the disclaimer that I am very new to multithreading and may be missing something obvious.

I’m currently using the below code to process all the files in a directory. My question is if it would ever be possible for a thread to finish, decrement numFilesLeft, and find it equal to 0 because the next item hasn’t been added as a work item and not because all the files have been processed? If this is possible what would be the standard way to make sure it doesn’t occur?

Thank you for your time.

List<Bar> bars = new List<Bar>();
int numFilesLeft = 0;
ManualResetEvent isWorkDone = new ManualResetEvent(false);

foreach (string dirName in Directory.GetDirectories(@"c:\Temp"))
{
    foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(dirName))
    {
        string temp = file;
        Interlocked.Increment(ref numFilesLeft);
        ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(delegate
        {
            try
            {
                List<Bar> results = Process(File.ReadAllText(temp));
                if (results.Count > 0)
                {
                    lock (bars) bars.AddRange(results);
                }
            }
            finally
            {
                if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref numFilesLeft) == 0)
                {
                    isWorkDone.Set();
                }
            }
        });
    }
}

isWorkDone.WaitOne();
isWorkDone.Close();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:41:00+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    Yes it is possible. The usual trick is to add one more count, for the operation of queuing the items itself:

    List<Bar> bars = new List<Bar>();
    int numFilesLeft = 0;
    ManualResetEvent isWorkDone = new ManualResetEvent(false);
    
    Interlocked.Increment(ref numFilesLeft);
    try
    {
    foreach (string dirName in Directory.GetDirectories(@"c:\Temp"))
    {
        foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(dirName))
        {
            string temp = file;
            Interlocked.Increment(ref numFilesLeft);
            ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(delegate
            {
                try
                {
                     ...
                }
                finally
                {
                    if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref numFilesLeft) == 0)
                    {
                        isWorkDone.Set();
                    }
                }
            });
        }
    }
    }
    finally
    {
     if (0 == Interlocked.Decrement(ref numFilesLeft))
     {
       isWorkDone.Set ();
     }
    }
    
    ...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let me preface this question with saying that I am very new to Orchard
Let me preface this question with the fact that I am very new to
Ok, let me preface this question with the fact that I am extremely new
First, let me preface this by saying that I'm brand-new to Ember.js and relatively
Let me preface by saying that I'm new to ant, and I'm using version
Let me preface this by saying that I'm pretty new to Java. I have
First let me preface this question by saying that I'm fairly new to Javascript.
Let me preface this question with first stating that I'm new to GUI interfaces:
Let me preface this with saying that I am new to Ruby. I was
Let me preface this question and state that using Entity Framework is not an

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.