Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 183527
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:07:55+00:00 2026-05-11T15:07:55+00:00

Let us say for a moment that C# allowed multiple return values in the

  • 0

Let us say for a moment that C# allowed multiple return values in the most pure sense, where we would expect to see something like:

string sender = message.GetSender(); string receiver = message.GetReceiver(); 

compacted to:

string sender, receiver = message.GetParticipants(); 

In that case, I do not have to understand the return values of the method until I actually make the method call. Perhaps I rely on Intellisense to tell me what return value(s) I’m dealing with, or perhaps I’m searching for a method that returns what I want from a class I am unfamiliar with.

Similarly, we have something like this, currently, in C#:

string receiver; string sender = message.GetParticipants(out receiver); 

where the argument to GetParticipants is an out string parameter. However, this is a bit different than the above because it means I have to preempt with, or at least go back and write, code that creates a variable to hold the result of the out parameter. This is a little counterintuitive.

My question is, is there any syntactic sugar in current C#, that allows a developer to make this declaration in the same line as the method call? I think it would make development a (tiny) bit more fluid, and also make the code more readable if I were doing something like:

string sender = message.GetParicipants(out string receiver); 

to show that receiver was being declared and assigned on the spot.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:07:56+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:07 pm

    No, there isn’t currently any syntactic sugar around this. I haven’t heard of any intention to introduce any either.

    I can’t say I use out parameters often enough for it really to be a significant concern for me (there are other features I’d rather the C# team spent their time on) but I agree it’s a bit annoying.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let say that I have many Javascript inside pages. At this moment is pretty
let's say that we ignore the target and source hardware for a moment. So,
So let's say I have an iterator it that returns something of class CustomClass.
let say i have function like below function doSomethingNow(){ callSomethingInFutureNotExistNow(); } at the moment
Let say that I have a website with some information that could be access
Let say that we have the following query: SELECT DISTINCT COUNT(`users_id`) FROM `users_table`; this
Let say, I have a web application that allows users to upload images and
Let me explain what I mean with that question: Lets say I have to
What is a good way to integrate multiple field validation with IDataErrorInfo? Let say
Let's say that we have one table with a field called sales_total and another

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.