Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4575298
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T20:02:37+00:00 2026-05-21T20:02:37+00:00

Let’s assume I have some MyObject obj object and want to access a property

  • 0

Let’s assume I have some MyObject obj object and want to access a property of that object such as obj.SomeCollection.SomeProperty. Is it possible to get that property on this object by combining obj and .SomeCollection.SomeProperty represented as a string without invoking any of the reflection functions for this particular step?

UPDATE: The reason why I’m trying to avoid reflection is because of a huge performance hit. Basically, I will use reflection in order to extract the string reperesentation of its constituent parts and store them in some kind of dictionary which will be reused from that point on, thus avoiding using reflection every time I need an access to object’s properties. The reason why I’m so worried about performance is because I need to use this process, if it exists, for enterprise-level system unit tests. With reflection this usage becomes unrealistic as it could take up to an hour to run these tests. Hope this explains my position.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T20:02:38+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:02 pm

    While I tend to agree with @Scott (why not use Reflection, perfect for this…) if you can serialize the object to XML, or even better an XML DataSet, you can use a variety of options to negotiate the object with strings as identifiers.

    Following edit posted following @Ukraine Train 2 comments re: performance

    @Ukraine Train, Neither reflection nor XML serialization are real performance dogs. “Performance” depends on how many iterations you are wanting to process and how fast you want to process them. Once you go through the instantiation of the object through reflection or XML serialization the object is then ‘in memory’ and all access will be via pointers. How many objects you want to reside in memory at a time, how long you want them to live are all strategic decisions I don’t have enough information to advise you on.

    If you want to be able to interrogate the object using string identifiers, your choices are pretty much reflection or serialization. I believe you are overestimating the performance hit of reflection when you call it ‘huge‘. The fastest thing you can accomplish is nothing, anything else takes time and resources.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say i have an android device that has some extra buttons on it,
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
Let's say that I have an arbitrary string like `A man + a plan
Let's say I have two files.. I want to compare them side-by-side and see
Let's say I have a table that looks something like this: ------------------------------- id|column2|column3 |column4
Let's say you have some products which have 2 fields, a description and a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.