Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6368605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T00:41:49+00:00 2026-05-25T00:41:49+00:00

Let’s consider a big file (~100MB). Let’s consider that the file is line-based (a

  • 0

Let’s consider a big file (~100MB). Let’s consider that the file is line-based (a text file, with relatively short line ~80 chars).
If I use built-in open()/file() the file will be loaded in lazy manner.
I.E. if a I do aFile.readline() only a chunk of a file will reside in memory. Does the urllib.urlopen() do something similar (with usage of a cache on disk)?

How big is the difference in performance between urllib.urlopen().readline() and file().readline()? Let’s consider that file is located on localhost. Once I open it with urllib.urlopen() and then with file(). How big will be difference in performance/memory consumption when i loop over the file with readline()?

What is best way to process a file opened via urllib.urlopen()? Is it faster to process it line by line? Or shall I load bunch of lines(~50) into a list and then process the list?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T00:41:50+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:41 am

    Does the urllib.urlopen() do something similar (with usage of a cache on disk)?

    The operating system does. When you use a networking API such as urllib, the operating system and the network card will do the low-level work of splitting data into small packets that are sent over the network, and to receive incoming packets. Those are stored in a cache, so that the application can abstract away the packet concept and pretend it would send and receive continuous streams of data.

    How big is the difference in performance between urllib.urlopen().readline() and file().readline()?

    It is hard to compare these two. For urllib, this depends on the speed of the network, as well as the speed of the server. Even for local servers, there is some abstraction overhead, so that, usually, it is slower to read from the networking API than from a file directly.

    For actual performance comparisons, you will have to write a test script and do the measurement. However, why do you even bother? You cannot replace one with another since they serve different purposes.

    What is best way to process a file opened via urllib.urlopen()? Is it faster to process it line by line? Or shall I load bunch of lines(~50) into a list and then process the list?

    Since the bottle neck is the networking speed, it might be a good idea to process the data as soon as you get it. This way, the operating system can cache more incoming data “in the background”.

    It makes no sense to cache lines in a list before processing them. Your program will just sit there waiting for enough data to arrive while it could be doing something useful already.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2
Let's say I have some text as follows: do this, do that, then this,
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is
Let's say I'm writing a PHP (>= 5.0) class that's meant to be a
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
Let me preface this question by saying I use TextMate on Mac OSX for
Let's assume that we are building a high traffic site that will be used
Let's say I have the following text: (example) <table> <tr> <td> <span>col1</span> </td> <td>col2</td>
Let's suppose that we have multi-site CMS and every website in this CMS having
Let's suppose I have a Discussion model, and that a discussion can be tagged.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.