Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4530478
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T13:48:18+00:00 2026-05-21T13:48:18+00:00

Let’s imagine we have several type of elements, and we want to create a

  • 0

Let’s imagine we have several type of elements, and we want to create a
‘manager’ for every type of them. The manager takes care of the
creation, activation/deactivation and removal for any of the elements
(we assume the user will no create/destroy the instances of these elements
without using the manager.
A very simple example of the code would be something like this:

template <class T>
class NonCachedElementMngr
{
public:
    NonCachedElementMngr():
        rmCounter(0)
    {}

    ~ NonCachedElementMngr()
    {
        T* element = 0;
        if(mElements.size() > 0)
        {
            typename std::set<T*>::iterator it;
            for(it = mElements.begin(); it != mElements.end(); ++it)
            {
                element = *it;
                element->deactivate();
                delete element;
            }
        }
    }

    T* create()
    {
        T* element = new T();
        element->activate();
        mElements.insert(element);
        return element;
    }

    bool release(T* element)
    {
        bool ret = false;
        typename std::set<T*>::iterator it;
        it = mElements.find(element);
        if(it != mElements.end())
        {
            element->deactivate();
            delete element;
            mElements.erase(it);
            ret = true;
        }
        return ret;
    }

private:

    std::set<T*> mElements;
    int rmCounter;
};

Let’s imagine now that, for a subgroup of objects,
apart from the basic operation, we need also to do
some caching. For that subgroup of types, we could
define another ‘manager’ like this:

template <class T>
class CachedElementMngr
{
public:
    CachedElementMngr():
        rmCounter(0)
    {}

    ~CachedElementMngr()
    {
        T* element = 0;
        if(mElements.size() > 0)
        {
            typename std::set<T*>::iterator it;
            for(it = mElements.begin(); it != mElements.end(); ++it)
            {
                element = *it;
                element->removeFromCache();  // <<<<<<<<<<<<<< Different line
                element->deactivate();
                delete element;
            }
        }
    }

    T* create()
            {
        T* element = new T();
        element->storeInCache(); // <<<<<<<<<<<<<< Different line
        element->activate();
        mElements.insert(element);
        return element;
            }

    bool release(T* element)
    {
        bool ret = false;
        typename std::set<T*>::iterator it;
        it = mElements.find(element);
        if(it != mElements.end())
        {
            element->removeFromCache();  // <<<<<<<<<<<<<< Different line
            element->deactivate();
            delete element;
            mElements.erase(it);
            ret = true;
        }
        return ret;
    }

private:

    std::set<T*> mElements;
    int rmCounter;
};

As obvious, both managers are exactly the same, except for the
three lines marked as so.
How could I refactor this two templates?
We know at compile time if a specific type will be cacheable or not.
Notice there is also a different line in the destructor.
Any feasible proposal (virtual inheritance, template specialization, SFINAE…) would be very welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T13:48:18+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 1:48 pm

    Factor out that specific behavior into a policy:

    #include <set>
    
    struct cached_tag;
    struct noncached_tag;
    
    template<typename Tag>
    struct ElementMngrCachePolicy;
    
    template<>
    struct ElementMngrCachePolicy<cached_tag>
    {
        template<typename T>
        static void removeFromCache(T* const element) { /*impl...*/ }
    
        template<typename T>
        static void storeInCache(T* const element) { /*impl...*/ }
    };
    
    template<>
    struct ElementMngrCachePolicy<noncached_tag>
    {
        template<typename T>
        static void removeFromCache(T* const) { /*do nothing*/ }
    
        template<typename T>
        static void storeInCache(T* const) { /*do nothing*/ }
    };
    
    template<typename T, typename CachePolicy>
    class ElementMngr
    {
        typedef std::set<T*> elements_t;
    
    public:
        ElementMngr() :
            rmCounter()
        { }
    
        ~ElementMngr()
        {
            for (typename elements_t::iterator it = mElements.begin(); it != mElements.end(); ++it)
            {
                T* const element = *it;
                CachePolicy::removeFromCache(element);
                element->deactivate();
                delete element;
            }
        }
    
        T* create()
        {
            T* const element = new T();
            CachePolicy::storeInCache(element);
            element->activate();
            mElements.insert(element);
            return element;
        }
    
        bool release(T* const element)
        {
            typename elements_t::iterator it = mElements.find(element);
            if (it == mElements.end())
                return false;
    
            CachePolicy::removeFromCache(element);
            element->deactivate();
            delete element;
            mElements.erase(it);
            return true;
        }
    
    private:
        elements_t mElements;
        int rmCounter;
    };
    
    template<typename T>
    class CachedElementMngr : public ElementMngr<T, ElementMngrCachePolicy<cached_tag> >
    { };
    
    template<typename T>
    class NonCachedElementMngr : public ElementMngr<T, ElementMngrCachePolicy<noncached_tag> >
    { };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's suppose I have a trait with two type parameters, e.g. trait Qux[A, B]
Let's imagine I have 40 projects: 20 with implementation and 20 with tests. Some
Let's say I have a datetime, June 16 2011 at 7:00. I want to
Let's say you create a wizard in an HTML form. One button goes back,
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.