Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 499885
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:01:52+00:00 2026-05-13T06:01:52+00:00

let’s say i have a blocking method , let’s call in Block(). as i

  • 0

let’s say i have a blocking method , let’s call in Block().

as i don’t want my main thread to block i might create a worker thread, that instead will call Block.

however, i have another condition.

i want the call to block to return in 5 seconds top, otherwise, i want to let the main thread know the call to Block failed and to exit the worker thread.

what would be the best solution to that scenario?

i thought something like that:
create a workher thread, in the worker thread to create a timer object with 5 seconds,
and in addition to call gettickcount before and after the call to Block and calculate the delta.

in addition i will define a boolean IsReturned indication whether the Block function returned already.
after the Block call to set it true.

according to that boolean in the Timer Function i decide how to proceed :

  1. if the boolean is true i do nothing.

  2. if the boolean is false i can queue an APC OnFailure or maybe signal Sucess event on the main thread, and exit the worker thread forcfully (the thing is i’m not sure if i can do that)

in addition after the block function return i check whether the delta is lett then 5 sec
and queue an APC OnSucess. (the question is does exiting the caller thread cancels the timer also ? cause basically after that the timer is useless )

p.s – if i can know for sure that i can cancel the worker thread within the timer function i don’t think i even need the gettickcount stuff.

thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:01:52+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:01 am

    I would suggest using the boost::threads library for this. You can periodically check if the blocking thread is joinable (ie, still working) and then interrupt it after five seconds. You will then need to write the blocking function to handle that interruption and cleanly exit.

    #include <boost/thread/thread.hpp>
    
    void Block(void)
    {
        //Do work and periodically call boost::this_thread::sleep()
        try
        {
            boost::this_thread::sleep(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(100));
        }
        catch(boost::thread_interrupted const&)
        {
            return;
        }
    }
    
    int main(int argc, char *argv[])
    {
        boost::thread blockThread(Block); //If Block takes arguments, just add them as arguments to the constructor.
        time_t startTime = time(NULL);
    
        while(true)
        {
            if(blockThread.joinable() && (time(NULL) - startTime) > 5)
            {
                blockThread.interrupt();
            }
            //Do whatever you want while waiting for the thread to finish.
        }
    }
    

    Edit: Check the Thread Management documentation for more interruption points and the definition for the boost threads class.

    Edit2: If you don’t need to do any work in the main thread while waiting for the blocking thread to complete, and there is no convenient place to handle interrupts in Block() you can explicitly kill the thread with something like this:

    void Block(void)
    {
        //Do work
    }
    
    int main(args)
    {
        boost::thread blockThread(Block);
    
        //timed_join() returns false if the thread is still running after the specified time.
        if(!blockThread.timed_join(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(5000)))
        {   //detach() will kill the thread, any memory initialised in Block() will not be freed, any locals may or may not be freed either.
            blockThread.detach();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 312k
  • Answers 312k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Update: Googling for the error message, I also find this:… May 13, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Why not use that? For customers' machine, you won't be… May 13, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your sample sqlite database doesn't have table named "animals". But… May 13, 2026 at 10:30 pm

Related Questions

I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
Let's say you create a wizard in an HTML form. One button goes back,
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let me try to explain what I need. I have a server that is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.