Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Let’s say I have a class Comment and I have a private field named commentDate which is a java.util.Date and with a getter named getCommentDate.
Why it’s better to return a copy of that date ( return new Date(commentDate.getTime()) ) than simply returning that date…
How can a user change the object state of that Date since it’s a getter, not a setter?
First off, please, please, please avoid using getters and setters as much as possible. If you have both of them for the same field you are almost certainly doing something wrong. I don’t care what the Java gurus are telling you. They don’t know what they’re talking about. This is not how OO works. OO is not a make-work project to turn field accesses into method calls. That doesn’t actually encapsulate anything.
That said: if you return the date itself, then the calling code has a reference to your date object, and can use its full interface. Since dates are mutable objects, the interface includes things that can change the object state. Since the reference is to your date, your date’s state will get changed. It doesn’t matter how the calling code got the date (i.e. “with a getter”).