Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4622610
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T02:52:04+00:00 2026-05-22T02:52:04+00:00

Let’s say I have a class. I would like to declare a property in

  • 0

Let’s say I have a class. I would like to declare a property in the following way:

  1. From outside of the class it should be read-only if accessed programmatically;
  2. It should be possible to set the value from the Interface Builder using an outlet;
  3. (From inside the class it should be writable, but I know how to do it).

The “solution” I came up with is to write a one-time setter:

- (void) setA: (ClassA *)a {
    if (aHaveBeenSet)
        return;
    else {
        // do what a setter have to do
        aHaveBeenSet == YES;
    }
}

But this setter still can be called from the code (though only once in effect), so it’s not quite a solution.

Another way is to mark the ivar as IBOutlet and make the property readonly like this:

@interface MyClass : NSObject {
     IBOutlet ClassA *a;
}
@property (readonly) ClassA *a;
@end

But according to this answer, it’s a poor style and makes memory management unclear.

Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T02:52:05+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:52 am

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the NIB loading mechanism checks for a setter method only when instantiating a .nib file at runtime. So that means you could declare your public property as readonly but write a “private” setter in your .m file:

    // MyClass.h
    @property (readonly, retain) IBOutlet ClassA *a;
    

    // MyClass.m
    @interface MyClass ()
    @property (readwrite, retain) ClassA *a;
    @end
    
    @implementation MyClass
    @synthesize a;
    ...
    @end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say I have a link in a table like: <td class=ms-vb width=100%> <a
Let's say I have a class like this: public class Person { private String
Let's say that I have an arbitrary string like `A man + a plan
Let's say I have a row: 一天吃一個蘋果 Someone enters as a query: 天蘋 Should
Let's say I have a table that looks something like this: ------------------------------- id|column2|column3 |column4
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
Let's say I have a property foo defined in my parent POM. Is it
Let's say I have the following code: Sub TestRangeLoop() Dim rng As Range Set
Let's say I have a javascript array with a bunch of elements (anywhere from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.