Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1098921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T00:39:15+00:00 2026-05-17T00:39:15+00:00

Let’s say I have a common method which creates a DB connection: Connection getConnection()

  • 0

Let’s say I have a common method which creates a DB connection:

Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
    Connection con = ... // create the connection
    con.setAutoCommit(false);
    return con;
}

I put the setAutoCommit(false) call here so that callers of this method never have to worry about setting it. However, is this a bad practice if the operation executed by the caller is only reading data? Is there any extra overhead?

My personal opinion is that it’s better to centralize the logic in one place, that way callers never have to set the auto commit and this avoids code redundancy. I just wanted to make sure it didn’t incur any unnecessary overhead for a read only operation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T00:39:15+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 12:39 am

    I put the setAutoCommit(false) call here so that callers of this method never have to worry about setting it.

    This is fine IMO and I personally believe that one should never ever enable auto-commit mode inside an application. So my recommendation would be to turn off auto-commit.

    However, is this a bad practice if the operation executed by the caller is only reading data? Is there any extra overhead?

    From a strict performance point of view, it’s starting and ending a database transaction for every SQL statement that has an overhead and may decrease the performance of your application.

    By the way, SELECT statements are affected by setAutoCommit(boolean) according to the javadoc:

    Sets this connection’s auto-commit
    mode to the given state. If a
    connection is in auto-commit mode,
    then all its SQL statements will be
    executed and committed as individual
    transactions
    . Otherwise, its SQL
    statements are grouped into
    transactions that are terminated by a
    call to either the method commit or
    the method rollback. By default, new
    connections are in auto-commit mode.

    The commit occurs when the statement
    completes.
    The time when the statement
    completes depends on the type of SQL
    Statement:

    • For DML statements, such as Insert, Update or Delete, and DDL statements,
      the statement is complete as soon as
      it has finished executing.
    • For Select statements, the statement is complete when the associated result
      set is closed.
    • For CallableStatement objects or for statements that return multiple
      results, the statement is complete
      when all of the associated result sets
      have been closed, and all update
      counts and output parameters have been
      retrieved.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a method in java, which looks up a user in
Let's say that I have a SQLite database that I create in a separate
Let's say you have a method that expects a numerical value as an argument.
Let's say I have a dataset, which can be neatly classified using weka's J48
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say I have two objects, Master and Slave . Slave has a method
Let's say I have some variables declared - but I don't know exactly which,
Let's say I don't have photoshop, but I want to make pattern files (.pat)
Let me explain best with an example. Say you have node class that can
Let's say I have a table with a Color column. Color can have various

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.