Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5976335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T21:12:49+00:00 2026-05-22T21:12:49+00:00

Let’s say I have a few controllers with long names like VeryLongNameController. By default

  • 0

Let’s say I have a few controllers with long names like VeryLongNameController.

By default ASP.NET MVC3 will map ~/VeryLongName or ~/verylongname to this controller. However I don’t like the use of capital names within the URL and would like it to map all long named controllers like ~/very-long-name instead.

I know that it’s possible to add custom routes one by one, but is there a way to change the default behavior?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T21:12:50+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 9:12 pm

    I’ve investigated this a bit more, and got it working by making my own IHttpHandler and IRouteHandler, looking at the source for System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler and System.Web.Mvc.MvcRouteHandler and basically copying and pasting and replacing how it resolves the controller name. However I don’t like this approach at all, as it feels too heavy-weight to redo the whole request processing pipe for a simple cosmetic task. Thus, I will go with adding manual routes for each controller which has two names (which there aren’t that many).

    UPDATE: I’ve come with a much simpler solution, and that is done through overriding ControllerFactory .

    public class ControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
    {
        public override IController CreateController(RequestContext requestContext, 
            string controllerName)
        {
            requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] =
                requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"].ToString().Replace("-", "");
            return base.CreateController(requestContext, controllerName.Replace("-",""));
        }
    }
    

    My blog post about it: http://cangencer.wordpress.com/2011/05/27/better-looking-urls-in-asp-net-mvc-3/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2
Let's say, I have a .NET 2 installed. Can I programmatically install version 4
Let's say I have table with column 'URL' whrere I store urls like this
Let's say that I have a set of relations that looks like this: relations
Let's say that I have classes like this: public class Parent { public int
Let's say I'm creating an OpenGL game in C++ that will have many objects
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.