Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 788183
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:19:16+00:00 2026-05-14T21:19:16+00:00

lets say i have a method which has two parameters. i have been implementing

  • 0

lets say i have a method which has two parameters. i have been implementing them as:

if(aObj instance of Marble)   {
   if(bObj instance of Bomb)   {
      this.resolve((Marble)aObj,(Bomb)bObj);
   }
}

as you can see its not a very pretty solution. i plan to implement using double dispatching, but with two parameters which both need double dispatching, im afraid im a bit stumped. any ideas please.

im implementing in java btw.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:19:17+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:19 pm

    If possible I would go with the visitor pattern.

    That is, the class that defines the method, (or rather, the methods for each type) implements an interface called visitor. Instead of doing instance-of checks, you then call object.accept(this). The object then calls the correct “visit”-method of the visitor.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a WCF service which has a method returning object Person.
Lets say I'm interacting with a system that has two incrementing counters which depend
Let's say I have two objects, Master and Slave . Slave has a method
I have a method which returns an array of fixed type objects (let's say
Let's say I have a method in java, which looks up a user in
lets say I have two methods in my controller to support both json and
I have a reasonably large set of strings (say 100) which has a number
I'm using MooseX::Declare and methods, which uses MooseX::Method::Signatures. Let's say I have a class
Lets say I have some sort of graphical animation code where I have two
Let's say I have two databases: one contains a list of books which are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.