Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7792493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T22:12:06+00:00 2026-06-01T22:12:06+00:00

Lets say I have a router which is configured to create actors on multiple

  • 0

Lets say I have a router which is configured to create actors on multiple remote nodes. Perhaps I have a configuration like this:

akka {
        actor {
            deployment {
                 /fooRouter {
                router = round-robin
                resizer {
                    lower-bound = 2
                    upper-bound = 10
                }
                target {
                    nodes = ["akka://mana@10.0.1.1:2555", "akka://mana@10.0.1.2:2555"]
                }
            }
        }
    }

If we pretend that one of these nodes, 10.0.1.1, for some reason, has lost connectivity to the database server, so all messages passed to it will result in failure. Is there some way that the router could come to know that the 10.0.1.1 node as effectively useless and stop using it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T22:12:08+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 10:12 pm

    No, currently there is not. You can have the actors on the failed node commit suicide, but as soon as the resizer starts new ones, they will reappear. Even with clustering support—which is yet to come—this would not be automatic, because connections to some external resource are not part of the cluster’s reachability metric. This means that you would have to write code which takes that node down explicitly, upon which the actors could be migrated to some other node (details are not yet fully fleshed out).

    So, currently you would have to write your own router as a real actor, which takes reachability into account.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Lets say I have an array like this: string [] Filelist = ... I
Lets say I have a class which routes messages to their handlers. This class
Lets say have this immutable record type: public class Record { public Record(int x,
Lets say I have a single object of type Car which I want to
Lets say we have something like: <div class=row> <div class=box> <a class=more href=#more/> </div>
Lets say i have a route like the following /{controller}/{action}/{id} Is it possible to
I have a simple controller like this (no, not really, but let's say I
Lets say we have this route: routes.MapRoute( Library, Lib/{id}/{lang}, New With {.controller = MyLibrary,
Lets say I have a Dictionary object: Dictionary myDictionary<int, SomeObject> = new Dictionary<string, SomeObject>();
Lets say I have the following code: abstract class Animal case class Dog(name:String) extends

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.