Let’s say I have a <ul> list:
<ul class="products">
...
</ul>
I want to select it with jQuery, then add some functions to that object. For example, I’d like to add an addProduct(productData) function and a deleteProduct(productId) function. However, I’d like the functions to only be added to the object that’s returned by the selector. So for example, something like this:
var productList = $.extend($('ul.products'), {
addProduct: function(productData) {
// add a new li item
},
deleteProduct: function(productId) {
// delete li with id
}
});
How would I do this using jQuery? The key point here is that I only want to add the functions to an instance returned by a jQuery selector. In other words, I don’t want to modify jQuery’s prototype or create a plugin, since those will make the functions available across everything, whereas I only want to add the functions to one specific instance.
If you only want the
addProductanddeleteProductmethods to feature on that single jQuery object, then what you’ve got will work fine; but you’ll have to keep a reference to that jQuery object/ only use it once, to preserve the existance of theaddProductanddeleteProductmethods.However, these
addProductanddeleteProductmethods are unique to that particular jQuery object; the methods won’t exist on any other jQuery objects you create;The best way do to this would be to go-back-to-basics and define separate
addProductanddeleteProductfunctions, which accept a jQuery object. If you wanted to restrict these functions to they only worked on theul.productsselector, you could do;This approach would be recommended as it keeps the
jQuery.fnAPI consistent; otherwise you’d be addingaddProductandremoveProductto somejQuery.fninstances but not others, or making their usage redundant in others. With this approach howeveraddProductandremoveProductare always there, but don’t get in anyones way if they don’t want to use them.Historical Notes
This answer was originally written in November 2011, when jQuery 1.7 was released. Since then the API has changed considerably. The answer above is relevant to the current 2.0.0 version of jQuery.
Prior to 1.9, a little used method called
jQuery.subused to exist, which is related to what you’re trying to do (but won’t help you unless you change your approach). This creates a new jQuery constructor, so you could do;Be careful though, the
$method alias would reference the oldjQueryobject, rather than thenewjQueryinstance.jQuery.subwas removed from jQuery in 1.9. It is now available as a plugin.