Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9124565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T06:36:02+00:00 2026-06-17T06:36:02+00:00

Let’s say I have a vector of Polygons, where each polygon contains a vector

  • 0

Let’s say I have a vector of Polygons, where each polygon contains a vector of Points. I have to iterate over all the points of all the polygons many times in my code, I end up having to write the same code over and over again:

for(std::vector<Polygon*>::const_iterator polygon = polygons.begin();
                polygon != polygons.end(); polygon++)
{
        for(std::vector<Point>::const_iterator point = (*polygon)->points.begin();
                        point != (*polygon)->points.end(); point++)
        {
                (*point).DoSomething();
        }
}

I really feel that is a lot of code for two simple iterations, and feel like it’s clogging the code and interfering with the readability.

Some options I thought are:

  • using #defines – but it would make unportable (to use in other parts of the code). Furthermore, #defines are considered evil nowadays;
  • iterate over vector->size() – it doesn’t seem the most elegant way;
  • calling a method with a function pointer – but in this case, the code that should be inside of the loop would be far from the loop.

So, what would be the most clean and elegant way of doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T06:36:04+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 6:36 am

    In C++11, using ranged-base for loops and the auto keyword:

    for(const auto& polygon : polygons) {
        for(const auto& point : polygon->points) {
            point.DoSomething();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a main folder in my website named test which contains
Let's say I'm creating an OpenGL game in C++ that will have many objects
Let's say I have a large amount of files, say 20GB worth, all encrypted
Let's say I'm outputting a post title and in our database, it's Hello Y&#8217;all
Let's say I don't have photoshop, but I want to make pattern files (.pat)
Let's say I have a method in java, which looks up a user in
Let me explain best with an example. Say you have node class that can
Let's say I have a table with a Color column. Color can have various
Let's say that I have a SQLite database that I create in a separate
Let's say I have thousands of users and I want to make the passwords

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.