Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1073657
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T21:01:10+00:00 2026-05-16T21:01:10+00:00

Let’s say I have an increasing sequence of integers: seq = [1, 1, 1,

  • 0

Let’s say I have an increasing sequence of integers: seq = [1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4 … ] not guaranteed to have exactly the same number of each integer but guaranteed to be increasing by 1.

Is there a function F that can operate on this sequence whereby F(seq, x) would give me all 1’s when an integer in the sequence equals x and all other integers would be 0.

For example:

t = [1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4]

F(t, 2) = [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]

EDIT: I probably should have made it more clear. Is there a solution where I can do some algebraic operations on the entire array to get the desired result, without iterating over it?

So, I’m wondering if I can do something like: F(t, x) = t op x ?

In Python (t is a numpy.array) it could be:

(t * -1) % x or something…

EDIT2: I found out that the identity function I(t[i] == x) is acceptable to use as an algebraic operation. Sorry, I did not know about identity functions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T21:01:11+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    There’s a very simple solution to this that doesn’t require most of the restrictions you place upon the domain. Just create a new array of the same size, loop through and test for equality between the element in the array and the value you want to compare against. When they’re the same, set the corresponding element in the new array to 1. Otherwise, set it to 0. The actual implementation depends on the language you’re working with, but should be fairly simple.

    If we do take into account your domain, you can introduce a couple of optimisations. If you start with an array of zeroes, you only need to fill in the ones. You know you don’t need to start checking until the (n - 1)th element, where n is the value you’re comparing against, because there must be at least one of the numbers 1 to n in increasing order. If you don’t have to start at 1, you can still start at (n - start). Similarly, if you haven’t come across it at array[n - 1], you can jump n - array[n - 1] more elements. You can repeat this, skipping most of the elements, as much as you need to until you either hit the right value or the end of the list (if it’s not in there at all).

    After you finish dealing with the value you want, there’s no need to check the rest of the array, as you know it’ll always be increasing. So you can stop early too.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say you have a class library project that has any number of supplemental
Let's say I'm building a data access layer for an application. Typically I have
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say I have a drive such as C:\ , and I want to
Let's say that we have an ARGB color: Color argb = Color.FromARGB(127, 69, 12,
Let's say I have two tables orgs and states orgs is (o_ID, state_abbr) and
Let's say on a page I have alot of this repeated: <div class=entry> <h4>Magic:</h4>
Let's say I have window.open (without name parameter), scattered in my project and I
Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.