Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1049583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:38:24+00:00 2026-05-16T16:38:24+00:00

Let’s say I have an interface public interface IFoo { … } and I

  • 0

Let’s say I have an interface

public interface IFoo {
   ...
}

and I have several implementing classes

public class Foo implements IFoo {
    ...
}

...

public class Bar implements IFoo {
    ...
}

...

public class Baz implements IFoo {
    ...
}

I want to reference IFoo in MXML like this

<ns:IFoo id="myfoo"/>

and have it be instantiated at runtime by a factory.

However, the compiler won’t let me do this– it’s trying to do “new IFoo” in the generated ActionScript.

How to get around this? How can I use an interface and a factory purely in MXML?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:38:25+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:38 pm

    Declaring an MXML child instantiates an object of that type – you can’t simply declare a property in MXML without associating an instance with it.

    Given that – there’s no way to achieve the equivalent of

    public var myFoo:IFoo;
    

    in your MXML.

    As James pointed out, you can use a ClassFactory to acheive the following:

    <mx:ClassFactory class="{Foo}" id="fooFactory" />
    

    but you would be required to call fooFactory.newInstance() to get an IFoo.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.